Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Arbitrum DAO faces U.S. court freezing $71 million worth of Ethereum
CryptoWorld News reports that the plan by Arbitrum DAO to use the frozen hacker funds has been legally restricted by an American court. According to documents from the Southern District of New York, the plaintiff filed a restraining notice on May 1st through Arbitrum’s governance forum, preventing the transfer of 30,766 ETH (worth nearly $71.1 million), which were frozen by the Arbitrum Security Council after the Kelp DAO was attacked. The lawyer representing the plaintiff stated that these seized ETH constitute property held by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). The plaintiff’s claim is based on allegations that the funds were stolen by the Lazarus Group, which is believed to serve Pyongyang. Arbitrum’s intervention began on April 20th, when its Security Council transferred the assets to a controlled wallet after identifying addresses associated with the attacker. In an update on April 21st, the network stated that the freeze was based on input from law enforcement regarding the attacker’s identity, and that the action did not affect user activity or applications.