Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 40+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
On-chain analysis questions the U.S. allegations of "Iranian crypto assets," as some seized wallets may be linked to actors from other countries.
ME News report, May 4 (UTC+8), Nominis analysis says that some “Iran-related” crypto wallets recently seized and frozen by the U.S. OFAC may not match the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)’s prior on-chain operating patterns, and may instead involve other state-level actors. Previously, the U.S. Treasury Department said that in “Operation Economic Fury,” more than $340 million—amounting to nearly $500 million in total—of Iran-related crypto assets had been frozen. Nominis CEO Snir Levi said that historically, IRGC-related wallets typically distribute funds across multiple addresses, keep balances in any single wallet relatively low, avoid long-term holdings, and reduce the risk of being frozen through complex operations; however, the wallets that were seized this time show clear differences in their fund structure and behavior patterns. He believes this raises a key question: out of the frozen $340 million, how much is directly controlled by the IRGC, and how much involves broader infrastructure that may even overlap with other countries’ financial networks. Levi also noted that organizations—including the IRGC and potential Chinese state-level actors—are continuously upgrading how they use blockchain infrastructure, and that traditional static risk-control tags are no longer sufficient; behavioral analysis and address clustering are becoming increasingly critical. (Source: ChainCatcher)