Simply put, what the authorities want is to put a leash on the reserve assets backing stablecoins, limiting the proportion of tokenized assets. When BlackRock heard this, they weren’t happy: “That logic, brother!” BlackRock’s complaints are as follows:

Also, the “format” angle is that it’s about whether the assets are safe, whether they’re worth anything, and how easy they are to liquidate—not whether they’ve been put on-chain. If you insist on setting an upper limit for tokenized assets, that’s not regulation—that’s “bias.” Don’t worry for no reason: as long as the quality of the underlying assets is solid, whether or not you use diversification in your holdings, there’s basically no risk impact at all.

Blogger translation: BlackRock is helping everyone take down the final wall between “traditional finance” and the “on-chain world.” In the eyes of the big players, everything can be tokenized—do you want the official side to set a cap? No way! It’s like you convert your family’s passbook into online banking—the money is still the same, and safety hasn’t changed. So why restrict the amount I can keep in the electronic version?

With this wave of support from the big players—and with this “boss” helping—you think stablecoins’ spring is about to speed up again? In the comments, tell me: do you stand with BlackRock, or with regulation? 👇#WCTC交易王PK #美联储利率不变但内部分歧加剧 $BTC $LAB $ETH