As a regular user, it’s best to lower your expectations for “on-chain privacy” first: expose as little as possible, but don’t count on being completely anonymous—and don’t treat compliance as something far removed from you. The reason is pretty realistic: on-chain data is inherently traceable. If today you casually link your address to your exchange account, social media, or a task platform, tomorrow it could be stitched together by all kinds of graphs. And during airdrop season, this anti-sybil + points-based setup makes it feel like clocking in for work—the platforms, for risk control, increasingly love collecting behavioral features, and basically, your privacy boundaries get squeezed out little by little. Anyway, that’s what I do now: I use addresses in layers as much as I can, reduce authorizations, and when it comes to exchanges, follow the compliance approach—don’t, on the one hand, think you’ll get rewards while, on the other, imagining that “nobody can see.”

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin