I’ve been asked again recently about LST/re-staking—where exactly the “yield” comes from. Put simply: the basic part is the rewards given by the consensus layer. The extra layer outside that is usually one of these: someone is willing to spend money to rent your security/validation resources, or the project team uses incentives to lock you in so they can drive growth. It all sounds pretty reasonable, but the risks are also very straightforward: the same piece of collateral gets repeatedly promised, and when something goes wrong, everyone rushes to redeem at the same time. Add to that the blame from the contracts/oracles/operators—on-chain it looks transparent, but in reality it’s still a whole set of trust boundaries.



My approach now is to treat that “extra layer” as high-volatility income, and I ask one question first: who is paying, why are they able to keep paying, and in the worst case, what exactly will I get back? It also makes me think about NFT royalties—creators want stable income, while trading platforms want liquidity. LSTs are similar: if you want higher returns, you have to introduce more games and friction, and in the end it’s all tugging at the same blanket. Anyway, I’ll go slower for now—I’d rather earn less than risk sacrificing my sleep by staking.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin