【Breaking Emergency News: LayerZero Officially “Admits Guilt,” Can a Pricey Compensation of 10,000 ETH Plug the $290 Million Black Hole?】


Folks, the DeFi world is completely going off the rails today! The KelpDAO rsETH crisis has finally reached its “final chapter”—LayerZero Labs has officially admitted that its own bridge DVN vulnerability is the “main culprit” behind this jaw-dropping disaster!
Even more explosive: to calm public outrage, LayerZero directly played its “ace card”—promising to donate over 10,000 ETH to support Aave, trying to win back trust with real money!
But here’s the problem: can these 10,000 ETH really fill the $290 million hole? After all, this time the hacker used the vulnerability to forge cross-chain messages and minted 116,500 uncollateralized rsETH, directly causing massive bad debts for protocols like Aave. DeFi TVL has evaporated by nearly $10 billion, stablecoins have shed $892 million, and the claims that “DeFi is dead” have spread far and wide!
What’s even more ironic is that the Arbitrum Security Council used “god mode” to recover 30.7k ETH. Although it froze $71 million, it also sparked huge controversy over “decentralization principles”—it turns out that so-called “decentralization,” when faced with a crisis, still has to rely on “centralized rescue” to stabilize the situation!
Now the entire industry is “crowdfunding” to mount a rescue, but whose money will compensate retail users? And what about the players who got liquidated because rsETH de-pegged—who should they go to for an explanation?
LayerZero’s “cutting losses” move to save the market—was it genuine repentance, or just an effort to protect its own “cross-chain bridge dominance”? Can Aave borrow this ETH to “raise itself from the dead”? Or is this merely the beginning of a “DeFi trust crisis”?
Tell me in the comments: will you still trust cross-chain bridges? Can this wave of “compensation” restore your trust? #WCTC交易王PK #加密市场小幅下跌 #Polymarket每日热点 #Strategy吸筹速度超挖矿两倍 $BTC
BTC-0.43%
View Original
post-image
post-image
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments