Recently, some people have been using "tags/clusters" to draw conclusions about addresses. Honestly, I just treat it as a reference: the same group of people changing a few layers of intermediaries, using bridges, then splitting small amounts, instantly makes the profile look like a "retail investor"; conversely, if a hot wallet of an exchange shakes, it's immediately seen as "the whale woke up." I've been monitoring large transactions on bridges for a long time, and I increasingly feel that tags are like weather forecasts—useful but not to be taken as gospel, especially when faced with delays and cross-chain fee issues that can be frustrating. Judgments can easily be swayed by emotions. The turning point is that recently, with some regions increasing taxes and changing compliance trends, deposit and withdrawal expectations have become more sensitive, and fund routing has become more "circuitous." So now I prefer to observe several real transaction flows and timing patterns rather than making quick judgments based on a single indicator. Anyway, it's better to stay conservative for now.