Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
An interesting controversy happened in the Ethereum community this week. Vitalik Buterin made a comment that caught everyone by surprise: he basically said that the idea that the network would need Layer 2s to achieve mass adoption "no longer makes sense." Like, after years being the dominant narrative among developers, the person with the most voice inside suddenly changes position out of nowhere.
Of course, the founders of Layer 2s didn’t let it slide. Karl Floersch from Optimism was one of the first to respond, posting in uppercase "CHALLENGE ACCEPTED" on social media. And almost everyone working on L2s rushed to social media to defend their work.
What happened is that for years there was a consensus among developers: the fastest way to scale Ethereum would be through these Layer 2 blockchains, which would process transactions and then send them to Ethereum for final settlement. It was like the master plan. But then a more serious critique started to emerge in the last 12 months. With Ether stagnating while Bitcoin rose (especially after Trump’s re-election), many people began to think that L2s had become "parasitic," you know? Processing transactions that could be happening directly on Ethereum.
Vitalik cited two reasons for this change: the disappointing progress of L2s and the fact that Ethereum itself has improved a lot. He basically said that Layer 1 is now scaling on its own and no longer needs L2s functioning as "sharded branded" solutions. But here comes the plot twist: he’s not talking about abandoning Layer 2s, it’s more about them finding a new reason to exist beyond just scaling.
The founders of L2s responded quickly. Some are already working on this kind of differentiation that Vitalik mentioned—privacy, specific application features, customization. Alex Gluchowski from Zksync said they’ve been talking about this for over a year. Steven Goldfeder from Arbitrum made a very valid point: just because Ethereum is scaling better doesn’t mean it will be able to handle the enormous volume that L2s process today. Also, he reminded that L2s have become much more about customization and control than just scaling.
What stands out is that Vitalik Buterin remains the most influential voice there, leading the Ethereum Foundation, so when he changes his opinion like that, it significantly impacts the direction everything takes. But it seems that L2 developers don’t really care about this narrative shift—they’re each doubling down on their own added value. The debate remains open.