Recently, with the wave of re-pledging and shared security, everyone is talking more about "whether the returns can be stacked another layer," but I am actually a bit cautious: stacking returns easily leads to stacking illusions as well. To put it simply, if you use the same collateral to back more systems, earning is possible, but when things go wrong, they are more likely to shake together; the correlation can't be summarized by the kind of "risk warning" on a webpage.

These days, the enthusiasm for testnet incentives and earning points has risen again, and some people are guessing every day whether the mainnet will issue tokens... I can understand, after all, who doesn't want to get ahead of the game. But right now, I am more like watching "what actual guarantees does this shared security provide, and how to handle problems when they arise," rather than watching the points panel grow step by step. Anyway, my approach is: only participate if you understand the penalty/exit mechanisms, and don't treat "possible airdrops" as the underlying cash flow. That's all for now.