Recently, someone asked me why the APY of yield aggregators is so high... I usually don't look at the numbers first, I check which pools the money is being put into, whether there's a chain swap/bridge step involved. To put it simply, many times, aggregators are just packaging a series of contracts and counterparties for you to see; the interface only shows "peace of mind," but the risks are still there. Latency and fees might also wear you down mentally.



When I monitor large amounts on bridges, I’m also quite sensitive: a sudden large deposit into a certain chain, then a little while later, a similar amount moving back in the same direction—most likely coordinating a strategy or emergency withdrawal. The APY you see might be backed by "someone providing liquidity" or "someone taking on the fees." If something really goes wrong, it won't just slowly lose value over a year; it can happen in an instant.

By the way, recently with social mining and fan tokens—this idea that "attention is mining"—I always feel it’s more like treating attention as collateral... It’s lively, but in the end, who’s on the other side is really hard to say. Anyway, I’d rather earn a little less now than hand my money over to a bunch of contracts I can’t see clearly, stacking up like a game.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin