Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
Recently, I came across something Vitalik has been proposing, and honestly, it changed the way I see Ethereum. The question is simple but unsettling: what happens if tomorrow all the main developers disappear? Or if a country decides to censor specific transactions? It sounds extreme, but it’s not that far-fetched.
Vitalik calls it "refuge technologies," and the idea is deeper than it appears. It’s not just about having a decentralized network in theory, but about building systems that truly work when things get tough. Think of it this way: if Ethereum were truly censorship-resistant, it should keep functioning even if someone tries to turn it off. A hammer is yours forever; a service can disappear at any moment.
Now, the real problem Ethereum faces is much more concrete. Builders have become increasingly powerful in block construction, meaning a few actors can control which transactions go into a block. Theoretically, they could reject transactions from specific addresses, like those linked to Tornado Cash. That’s not theoretical censorship; it’s a real risk.
That’s where FOCIL comes in. This proposal introduces inclusion lists that guarantee valid transactions are actually included in blocks, without relying entirely on the builder’s will. It doesn’t eliminate builders, but it strips them of veto power. It’s pure engineering: through a validator committee that forms a list of transactions to include, FOCIL forces that list to be respected. Builders can still optimize ordering and profit from MEV, but they can no longer censor.
But wait, there’s another problem. Even before a transaction reaches a block, it’s exposed to everyone. Searchers can see exactly what you’re going to do and front-run or perform sandwich attacks. For DeFi, this is devastating.
The solution being discussed is a cryptographic mempool. Basically, you encrypt your transaction, it’s decrypted after being included in a block with enough confirmations, and until then, no one can see it. No visibility, no front-running. Without FOCIL and cryptographic memory, the problem persists; together, they create what some call the "censorship resistance trinity."
What’s fascinating is that FOCIL is already confirmed for the next major upgrade after this year. The cryptographic memory (LUCID) is also fighting to be included as a main proposal.
Honestly, this is what makes Ethereum different. It’s not just about speed or low fees. It’s about ensuring that when you really need a permissionless digital exit, with no one able to kick you out, it’s there. That’s what it means to be a true refuge technology. And that’s what FOCIL represents: not good faith or hope, but protocol rules that guarantee it.