The matter of freezing ETH is more worth studying than hackers

Many people focus on "KelpDAO being hacked," but what’s actually more worth studying is—why can Arbitrum freeze?
Behind this is a major shift happening in Web3:
Technical systems are beginning to have "intervention capabilities."
This sounds a bit sensitive, but the reality is—without intervention, there are no safety boundaries.
Imagine if there were no freezing mechanisms, what would happen to this ETH?
Cross-chain → mixing → decentralization → completely disappearing.
And now, it’s stuck at the first step.
It’s like an anti-theft system upgrading from "alarm" to "automatic door lock."
Looking at user psychology, it’s actually very simple:
People are not opposed to decentralization, but they definitely don’t want to become "victims of decentralization."
So, the true competitiveness is no longer "who is more decentralized,"
but "who can find a balance between security and efficiency."
What Arbitrum has done this time is a typical example.
It didn’t change the rules but improved execution speed.
One last interesting point:
In the future, hackers might also need to do "risk control assessment"—
Can they attack this chain?
To sum up:
The highest realm of security is not to prevent all attacks, but to make attacks not worth it. #Arbitrum冻结KelpDAO黑客ETH