Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I've seen the secondary market treat the royalty switch as a chip to be manipulated back and forth, essentially everyone is looking for "who should pay the creators." I used to take sides, but now I prefer to lower my expectations first: royalties are not an inherent cash flow, but more like an experiment in community consensus, and a change in sentiment can cause leaks. Lower expectations make things easier, at least preventing "long-term creation" from being pinned on a toggle on someone else's interface.
The macro side also feels similar: expectations of interest rate cuts sometimes push risk assets higher, and other times they move in tandem with the dollar index, with logical reasons for both, but when it comes to positions, it’s very mysterious. Anyway, I now care more about whether on-chain can make "attribution, permissions, revenue sharing" more solid, even if it’s slower, it’s more reassuring than arguing over profit splits every day.