Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, I saw everyone complaining about miners/validators eating MEV and unfair ordering. Honestly, I feel pretty powerless about it... But for a newcomer trying to see if a project is "reliable," I personally focus on three small things first: whether there's ongoing activity on GitHub (not just a few thousand stars overnight), what the audit reports actually say (mainly look for whether issues found have been fixed, whether there are residual risks, and don't just look at the cover logo), and whether the upgrade permissions are multi-signature, who the signers are, what the threshold is, and if there's a timelock. It feels like renting a house: no matter how sweet the agent's words are, it's better to check the contract terms, property records, and whether the keys are all held by one person. Anyway, I’d rather take my time entering the market than be startled by the words "upgradable."