The fluctuating situation between the US and Iran is essentially a game of drawing lines based on news:

As soon as Trump releases a hint of negotiation easing, the market immediately reacts, sentiment quickly turns optimistic, safe-haven demand rapidly subsides, buying interest enters the market, and the trend is gently pushed upward. Just as the bulls start to enjoy some gains and their positions pile up with the trend, Iran suddenly acts to create conflict, triggering a quick response, the market sharply reverses and plunges, panic spreads, and the bulls are instantly suppressed, while the bears regain control in a short time.

When the market begins to imagine that the conflict might spiral and turn generally pessimistic, both sides then tacitly soften simultaneously, showing willingness to return to negotiations. Capital quickly flows back, and the trend is strongly supported upward again.

This entire rhythm flows unnaturally smoothly, with each step hitting emotional turning points. There’s no real intention to go to war, nor any sincerity in reaching an immediate agreement. All statements and actions are aimed at serving price fluctuations—direction, strength, and rhythm—already arranged clearly in advance.

Conflict is just a backdrop, negotiations are just lines in a script, and the real plot is to make the K-line follow a preset route, conveniently clearing out positions chasing emotions along the way.

This isn’t genuine geopolitical struggle; it’s clearly manipulation by news-based traders working together, using international news as a tool to control the market, drawing lines to harvest profits. Once you see through this, don’t let headlines steer your emotions—chasing longs or shorts is all passive. $BTC $ETH