Recently, the group has been arguing whether the extreme funding rate is a reversal or just a bubble squeeze.

I'm watching the excitement while also checking the project's "credibility" clues...
To put it simply, beginners shouldn't pretend to understand code; first, see if anyone is working on GitHub:
Are the commits mostly just changes to the README, are there serious discussions in issues/PRs, and does everything suddenly go quiet like a rug pull before and after an upgrade?
Don't just look at the words "audited" in the audit report; focus on what scope was covered, whether high-risk issues remain unfixed, and whether the auditor is the kind of firm with only a few records you can find.
Also, for multi-signature upgrades, who can sign, how many keys, is there a timelock—these are more practical than slogans.
Anyway, I’d rather slow down on scoring than get burned by a one-click upgrade...
Let's keep looking.