I started to document one thing: how modularity, in simple terms, actually changes things for end users like me. As I recorded it, I realized that what I usually feel isn’t “more advanced architecture,” but rather the number of times I need to sign transactions, how long cross-chain transfers take, whether the fees feel like a roller coaster, and who to blame when something goes wrong… those are the real pain points.



Recently, a new wave of incentives for L1/L2 projects has boosted TVL. Old users complain about “mining, selling, and withdrawing,” which I understand. It’s lively, but if using it still involves a bunch of bridges and a bunch of point-earning tasks, then modularity is like a taco platter with more and more toppings, eventually falling apart on the plate. For me, the real change equals less hassle, more stability, and accountability when issues arise—don’t just dump all the complexity onto the users.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin