Last night I was again looking at a few DAO proposal votes, and the more I looked, the more it seemed like "delegated voting = entrusting your vote to big players," claiming to be community governance, but in the end, it's just a few addresses calling the shots. It's not necessarily their fault; more often, people are too lazy to read the documents, find it troublesome, so they just delegate and call it a day... So who exactly is governance token governing? Probably the participation of retail investors.

Recently, NFT royalties have also been a heated topic, with creators wanting stable income, while exchanges/markets want liquidity and are being held back by taxes. It sounds like a clash of values, but it’s also like governance: whoever controls the entry point to the rules can define "fairness" into a version that’s more comfortable for themselves.

I'm now more laid-back; if I can vote myself, I vote myself. If not, I simply don’t vote, so I don’t have to give away my vote and think I participated. I keep my orders hanging, wait patiently, and that’s how I’ll do it for now.