Recently, I've seen everyone rushing to test the network incentives, and some are still guessing whether the mainnet will issue tokens... I’ve actually calmed down a bit: don’t ask “Will it give tokens or not,” ask first “Is it worth my time/money to put in?”

Beginners want to read about “credibility,” and I’m currently focusing on three things: whether GitHub is maintained long-term, not just a sudden burst of commits; don’t just look at the cover logo of the audit report, flip through a few pages to see if high-risk points are clearly written out and whether they were ultimately addressed; who holds the upgrade permissions—preferably multi-signature, and can see that the signers are dispersed, not all from the same company handling it alone. To put it simply, the more I need to do tasks to earn points, the more I want to check these things first; otherwise, I might just end up paying tuition... I’d rather spend less.