Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I now look at on-chain data and generally assume "it might be a few seconds to a few minutes late," so I don't trust those dashboards as the absolute truth... Especially when you're watching a specific swap/liquidation, that tiny delay can be enough for you to misjudge.
The reason is quite simple: you're connecting to someone’s RPC, whether they have rate limiting/queuing, whether the node is behind on height; further down the line, there are indexers/parsing services, block grabbing, database entry, metric calculations, caching—each layer can have delays and packet loss. To put it plainly, what you see as "on-chain" is often "on-chain as translated by someone else."
Recently, AI agents/auto-trading have been quite popular, but I worry more that they default to using the same public RPC + indexer, with narratives blown out of proportion and safety details not carefully considered: data is half a beat slow + simulation inconsistencies, so no matter how smart the strategy, mistakes can happen. Anyway, whenever I make on-chain judgments now, I first check which data source it’s from, whether there's a secondary reference source, and I prefer to be a bit slower.