My current biggest feeling about the "modular chain/DA layer" is: it really doesn't have much short-term disruption for ordinary users. It's more about having a few more chains in the wallet, a few more bridge transactions, a few more signature clicks... To put it simply, the experience isn't more enjoyable or smoother; in fact, it's easier to get lost.



But looking on the bright side, it might turn "which chain is the most powerful" into "which application runs stably, with lower fees, and no lag." Developers are indeed quite excited; the underlying layer can be disassembled and reassembled. On the user side, it's normal to be confused—we perceive only: transaction confirmation speed, fees, and occasional cross-chain transaction delays. Anyway, when I chase new protocols now, I first look at how funds migrate; if I can avoid cross-chain, I avoid it; if I must cross, I try a small amount first... For now, that's how I do it, to avoid staying up late re-evaluating everything.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin