Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
You know, I keep seeing people ask who is Richard Heart and why should they care about his legal troubles. Let me break down what actually went down with the SEC's case against him, because the details are pretty wild.
So Richard Scheuler – that's his real name, though he goes by Richard Heart – founded HEX and later PulseChain and PulseX. Back in 2023, the SEC came down hard on him with civil fraud charges. What made this different from other crypto legal battles wasn't just securities violations – they straight up accused him of running a scam. And honestly, once you dig into what they alleged, it's hard to argue otherwise.
Here's the part that really stands out: the SEC claimed Heart and his crew were literally recycling investor money during the HEX presale between 2019 and 2020. They did this through something called the Hex Flush Address. Basically, funds would come in from supposed investors, get moved to an exchange, then get sent back to the contract address but disguised as new money coming in. The result? What looked like $678 million in ETH investment was actually only about $34 million in real investor funds. The recycling made up 94-97% of the supposed presale total. That's not a gray area – that's textbook fraud.
What's particularly interesting is that Heart always denied controlling the Flush Address. But the SEC's investigation showed he absolutely did have the keys, which is exactly what let him pull off this manipulation in the first place.
Now, who is Richard Heart really when you look past the designer clothes and the persona? Someone who explicitly designed HEX with one goal: make the price go up. That's literally what he said. Not to build technology, not to solve problems – just price appreciation. And to make that happen, he created what he called a "staking" program that was completely fake.
In real proof-of-stake systems, staking serves an actual function – validators do real work securing the network. But HEX's staking? It just locked up tokens for long periods in exchange for high returns paid in more HEX. For years, HEX didn't even have its own blockchain, so the whole staking thing made zero technical sense. It was purely designed to keep tokens off the market and artificially pump the price. And if you didn't withdraw your stake on time, you got hit with penalty fees that went straight to Heart.
So HEX investors got hit twice. They bought worthless tokens for real money, then Heart convinced them to lock up those worthless tokens for an even smaller amount of worthless tokens spread out over time. Some got shaken down a third time through the penalty mechanics.
The bigger picture here is that HEX and Terra both relied on the same broken playbook: subsidized returns with no actual revenue model backing them up. Both projects promised you could get rich quick, both attracted people more interested in price action than actual technology, and both eventually got exposed as frauds.
What makes it hard to sympathize with HEX victims is that Heart was incredibly explicit about what he was doing. He wasn't hiding behind technical jargon or complex narratives. He was basically saying "I made a token that only goes up" and people believed him. Investors who bought in after the presale have lost up to 99% of their money. That's what happens when your entire investment thesis is "number go up" instead of actual utility or a sound financial model.
The whole thing is a textbook example of why you need to look under the hood. If something feels off about a project's fundamentals, there's probably something way worse going on beneath the surface.