Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, people have been talking about LST and re-staking again. To put it plainly, it’s taking the “security that was just sitting there” and putting it to work for extra money. Where does the yield come from? It’s nothing more than someone being willing to pay you: the protocol issues incentives, the projects purchase security, or—more directly—those who come after take over and subsidize those ahead. It all sounds great, but what I care about more right now is where the risks come from: if you repeatedly stack the same collateral, it looks thriving on-chain, but when something goes wrong, the liquidations will stack up too, and the stampede will happen faster.
It’s a bit like the economic collapse breakdown in chain games: inflation, studios, a spiral in coin prices—just a different skin. Anyway, whenever I see the words “increased yield,” my first reaction isn’t happiness; it’s to ask: who actually is paying for this money, and whether they can sustain it for long. For now, I’ll go quiet and keep diving into the shadows.