Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
U.S. stock CFD derivatives
US Stocks
Access real US stocks and ETFs
HK Stocks
Trade quality Hong Kong-listed stocks
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
GUSD
Mint GUSD for Treasury RWA yields
Stocks Activities
Trade Popular Stocks and Unlock Generous Airdrops
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
South Korea's Missing Seized Bitcoin: A $48M Phishing Attack Raises Custody Security Concerns
Source: CryptoTale Original Title: Seized Bitcoin Vanishes as South Korea Expands Crypto Control Original Link: South Korean prosecutors are investigating the disappearance of Bitcoin seized as criminal proceeds after an internal audit flagged missing assets under state custody. Authorities estimate the loss at approximately 70 billion won, or $48 million. A senior prosecution source indicated that the Bitcoin likely vanished during management in mid-2025.
Audit Findings and Suspected Phishing Attack
The Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office confirmed the missing Bitcoin during a recent internal review. The assets came from a prior criminal case and no longer appear in official records.
Prosecutors believe the loss occurred in the middle of last year while officials stored and managed the Bitcoin. Investigators suspect phishing, though they declined to disclose exact amounts or current valuations during the ongoing probe.
Early evidence indicates that officials stored the Bitcoin on a portable USB device with a custody system. Reports also state that a wallet password reached a third party during a routine inspection, enabling unauthorized transfers.
Legal Context and Prior Precedents
The case surfaced shortly after a Supreme Court ruling confirmed that Bitcoin held on exchanges can be seized under the Criminal Procedure Act. The ruling involved 55.6 BTC seized from a money laundering suspect.
That decision reinforced earlier judgments that classify cryptocurrencies as intangible assets with economic value. A 2018 ruling first established that courts could seize crypto linked to criminal activity. Later decisions expanded seizure authority further, confirming that Bitcoin on domestic exchanges qualifies for confiscation during criminal proceedings.
Broader Security Concerns
This marks the second major Bitcoin controversy tied to Gwangju authorities. In November 2021, 1,476 BTC disappeared during a police seizure from an illegal gambling site, with litigation still pending.
The present case raises critical security concerns about internal controls and human vulnerabilities in state custody of digital assets. The data shows that worldwide phishing and scam activities resulted in $1.37 billion of losses during 2025, representing a 64% increase from the previous year.
With over 16 million crypto account holders in South Korea, the case underscores the security risks arising from current methods authorities use to store and protect digital assets. The incident demonstrates that human mistakes pose a greater security risk to institutional cryptocurrency operations than blockchain technology weaknesses.