Recently, more and more listed companies are starting to venture into the crypto space by issuing their own tokens. This wave of enthusiasm seems full of imagination, but a deeper reflection reveals that there are actually many risks involved.

On one hand, listed companies rely on the credibility and resources of the capital market, and entering Web3 can indeed bring liquidity and market attention. These companies usually have a complete compliance system and operational experience, making them more secure compared to wild project teams. On the other hand, the issues are also quite obvious—regulatory attitudes are still in the exploration stage, and policy risks are hard to predict. The compliance pressure faced by listed companies issuing tokens is often greater than that of pure Web3 projects, and they may face harsher penalties if regulatory adjustments occur.

There's also an easily overlooked point: does the project token's value itself hold? Can the brand power of a listed company truly translate into token demand? Historically, many tokens launched by large companies have ended up as tools for "harvesting" investors. Therefore, the key is to look at whether the project's actual application scenarios and economic model design are reasonable, rather than simply chasing the halo of a listed company.

In short, such investment opportunities do exist, but they are definitely not a guaranteed way to make easy money. A clear understanding of the project's fundamentals and risk tolerance is essential before participating.