Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
In the ten years of blockchain development, we made a fundamental mistake — treating technology itself as a product. The industry's obsession with TPS figures, the fixation on the complexity of zero-knowledge proofs, and the reverence for advanced whitepapers all overlook a simple fact: ordinary users don't care about the underlying consensus mechanisms. They only ask one question — is it fun? Is it easy to use?
The true driving force behind the internet's explosion has never been the sophistication of TCP/IP protocols, but rather accessible applications like email, instant messaging, and online games. To break through in Web3, we also need to find that spark that ignites public enthusiasm.
Against this backdrop, the emergence of Vanar Chain is quite interesting. This public chain originates from Terra Virtua — an old project that has been deeply involved in digital collectibles and the metaverse for years. This shift from the application layer to the infrastructure layer is not just a name change; it’s a strategic leap.
Why make such an upgrade? Because existing general-purpose public chains are far from friendly enough to support entertainment, gaming, and brand applications. Ethereum’s gas fees are staggering, Solana often experiences outages, and those high-performance chains lack sufficient commercial ecosystems.
Vanar’s ambition lies here — to build a Layer 1 public chain tailored for entertainment and mainstream brands. This is not about following the trend of creating more blockchains, but about addressing a real gap in the existing infrastructure. Transitioning from an application user to an infrastructure provider reflects a clear understanding of the industry’s pain points.
---
Another new public chain... Can it stop dropping blocks first
---
Sounds nice, but the key is whether the gas fees can be cheap
---
Talking about pain points every day, who is actually using this
---
I just want to know when this thing can be listed on an exchange
---
Turning from Terra Virtua... this background is a bit subtle
---
Breaking out of the circle? I think bankruptcy is more likely
---
Good performance but poor ecosystem, good ecosystem but too expensive to death, when will this vicious cycle be broken
---
Entertainment public chain? Just give it a try, anyway it’s all gambling
---
Just discovering a gap and thinking it can succeed? Don’t be ridiculous
Terra Virtua's move to turn into a public chain is a bit aggressive; finally, someone understands.
Ethereum's Gas fees are indeed outrageous, Solana still occasionally drops the chain, and the market gap is right there.
If Vanar can truly streamline the gaming and brand experience, this will be the breakthrough for Web3.
Jumping from the application layer to infrastructure, this opens up a new pattern.
To be honest, users don't nitpick about those parameters at all; they just want it to work, be cheap, and be fast.
Vanar's approach is quite clear; it's more reliable to build infrastructure from the application backwards.
---
Terra Virtua's move is quite interesting; it's like they've identified a pain point.
---
But the question is whether Vanar can truly retain users. Creating a useful application is the real key.
---
With Ethereum Gas fees so high, who still wants to play? This could be an opportunity.
---
However, it's very difficult for public chains like these to get off the ground. The ecosystem needs to be built up by itself; just talking about it isn't enough.
---
Hmm... If we can get ordinary people genuinely interested in playing, then we've won. Now it's just a matter of whether we can make it happen.
---
Games and entertainment are indeed breakthrough points. They're much better than DeFi's self-indulgence.
---
That's what they say, but right now, all public chains are competing on speed and cost. Differentiation is too difficult.
---
Wait, upgrading from applications to infrastructure? That approach seems a bit backwards...
---
The key is still to have a killer app. Otherwise, no matter how good the public chain is, it's all for nothing.
I actually think the Vanar idea is pretty good, definitely better than those who only boast about TPS.
Usability is king; everything else is just talk.
Terra Virtua is no longer doing well; can this turnaround succeed... hard to say.
Another new chain; only if the ecosystem can thrive will it be considered a win.
Honestly, games and entertainment are the real ways to bring ordinary people in; who cares about the technical jargon.
I think the Vanar approach is pretty good, reversing infrastructure based on user needs, which is better than those projects with increasingly thick whitepapers.
Another "we are different" public chain has been born; let's see how long it can survive.
Gas fees are indeed a pain point, but whether the new public chain can truly support a large ecosystem remains to be seen.
Coming from the experience of Terra Virtua, at least it's not a random guess from 0 to 1; this is worth paying attention to.
A public chain for gaming applications—I like this idea. It's more reliable than just another performance monster.
Wait, Solana often drops chains... Can Vanar guarantee it won't drop?
Really, creating a public chain with a soul is much more difficult than making a general-purpose one.
I agree that this time it's not just changing a name, but the difficulty of success also increases exponentially.
Daily TPS, consensus, whitepapers—users are already fed up
Vanar's approach is quite on point, starting from user experience to build infrastructure—that's the right way