2026-01-14 17:44:45

The technology stack came from the West. Manufacturing scaled in China. Now Beijing has locked down the solar, battery, and renewable energy supply chains—leaving Europe and the US fighting over scraps.

Here's the thing: let them dominate the green economy if they want to. Because green energy isn't the evolutionary endgame everyone's hyping it to be. It's an energy dead end wrapped in good intentions.

The real capital flows and competitive advantages? They'll follow whoever controls the next paradigm shift, not whoever wins yesterday's race for solar panels and lithium mines.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

EthSandwichHero

· 01-17 17:43

Green energy dead end? I actually think this guy is thinking too far ahead; that day hasn't come yet.

View OriginalReply0

PuzzledScholar

· 01-17 16:31

Speaking of which, is green energy really the "endgame"? It seems like everyone has been sold stories and fooled...

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 01-17 12:37

On-chain data shows that China has established an absolute monopoly in the new energy supply chain... but there are logical flaws in this article. From the code perspective, the essence of industry chain locking is a struggle for technical standard authority, not the final form. The interesting part is that the next paradigm shift may not be at the energy end at all, but rather a breakthrough in storage and conversion efficiency—monitoring indicates that the US still leads in basic research investment. Unsurprisingly, it's the old cliché of "green energy dead end" remarks.

View OriginalReply0

VitalikFanboy42

· 01-17 06:28

Speaking of which, it's really outdated to still be competing over solar panels... The real money is in the next paradigm shift.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCrazyGF

· 01-14 18:14

Wake up, new energy is not the end at all; we've all been brainwashed.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 01-14 18:11

That's right, green energy is not the endgame... the West is still calculating the costs of solar panels, while China has already planned the next step. Paradigm shift is where the real value lies.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseLandlady

· 01-14 18:06

This logic is actually quite clear-minded; green energy is not the endgame, just a transition.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 01-14 18:06

NGL, this viewpoint is interesting, but is green energy really a dead end? So where is all the global money flowing to now?

View OriginalReply0

DeFiGrayling

· 01-14 18:04

Nah, this logic doesn't hold up... The West develops the technology, China industrializes it to make money, and now you're saying green energy is a "dead end"? Why didn't you say this earlier?

View OriginalReply0

TxFailed

· 01-14 17:59

ngl this whole "green energy endgame" narrative is such cope. we built the stack, they optimized the supply chain, now we're shocked? classic mistake watching yesterday's game instead of prepping for tomorrow's. the real move isn't fighting over lithium—it's whoever figures out what comes after this entire paradigm breaks.

Reply0