Major institutional ETH accumulation hit a significant milestone last week. A prominent crypto fund acquired 24,266 ETH valued at approximately $75.59 million—the lowest weekly purchase quantity recorded historically. This pullback in acquisition pace comes as the fund's total ETH reserves stand at an impressive 4,167,768 tokens, representing roughly $12.98 billion in holdings. The shift in purchasing strategy signals evolving market positioning among major players in the Ethereum ecosystem.

ETH2.74%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-75ee51e7vip
· 01-15 01:50
It's slowing down, are you waiting for the bottom or out of money? An ETH position of 12.9 billion, that's a significant move.
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHuntervip
· 01-14 22:55
Are 24k ETH all considered a new historical low? This institution is probably about to start slowing down. They bought like crazy earlier, now they need to catch their breath.
View OriginalReply0
airdrop_huntressvip
· 01-12 17:59
24k ETH still called the minimum? What's going on, big players are also starting to hold and not move.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sippervip
· 01-12 17:58
Huh, the minimum weekly purchase amount? Is the institution testing the bottom or really thinking the price is high?
View OriginalReply0
PumpDoctrinevip
· 01-12 17:41
24k coins can't buy much anymore. Is this what you call a "new historical low"? Are the big players backing down or really out of money?
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalistvip
· 01-12 17:37
ngl, the fact they're slowing down accumulation at these price levels is kinda sus tbh... either they're rotating into other protocol infrastructure plays or the narrative's shifting harder than we thought. four million eth is already a cultural hegemon-level position anyway, might be time to think about distribution strategies rather than pure accumulation curves
Reply0
  • Pin