The unlimited inflation mechanism of SSV has always been a concern. Once the project falls into a slump in the token price, it often takes reckless measures—frequent issuance to maintain revenue, which results in a vicious cycle. The lower the price, the greater the issuance pressure; the more tokens issued, the harder it is to see a price increase. Ultimately, it leads to self-destruction.



But this is actually just a surface phenomenon. The real issue lies in the severe lack of ecological applications. Currently, SSV is purely a financial asset with no practical use cases to support it. Such tokens are most vulnerable to sell-offs in a bear market, especially when market sentiment shifts.

Instead of blindly issuing more tokens to dilute equity, project teams should focus on ecosystem development—strengthening the token’s practical value is the long-term strategy. Unrestrained issuance, in essence, is a breach of trust. The low token price has already tested participants’ confidence; adding issuance pressure only accumulates disappointment. This is definitely a toxic factor for the project’s future development.
SSV6.7%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
FromMinerToFarmer
· 01-10 07:42
Unlimited issuance is a dead end; the project team is truly hopeless.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster69
· 01-10 02:53
It's the same old story, blaming the ecosystem before each project crashes

The issuance mechanism is a complete trap, SSV should have been changed long ago

The project team is still dreaming, thinking that throwing money into building the ecosystem can save the situation

Basically, no one uses it, the coin has no value, and whether it increases or not, it's dead

Ecosystem deficiency? Come on, the problem is that the token itself isn't worth anything

I really don't touch tokens with infinite issuance, I've learned to be smart
View OriginalReply0
ContractTester
· 01-09 06:47
The old trick of issuing more tokens should really stop—dump the market and still want to maintain trust? Dream on.

The ecosystem hasn't kept up; no matter how many tokens there are, it can't be saved. The root of the problem is here.

But honestly, rather than reading papers, I really want to know where SSV actually intends to be used... Who would believe in a pure financial play?
View OriginalReply0
0xOverleveraged
· 01-09 06:43
It's the same story of issuing more tokens again; I'm already tired of it. If the ecosystem isn't doing well and they still want to rely on printing money to save the situation, isn't that like shooting oneself in the foot?
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_vibing
· 01-09 06:30
Basically, it's just coins with no product. No one uses the coins, yet they keep printing money artificially. What is this if not self-destructive?
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 01-09 06:28
This is a classic case of drinking poison to quench thirst; all these measures of increasing issuance will eventually have to be repaid.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin