2026-01-08 12:27:36

Remember last September's profit situation, when an XPL chip worth 170 points could be exchanged for 210U. Now? Making 200U in a month is already considered a good result.

Interestingly, many people are still hoping to return to the previous levels, but the exchange data is already in front of us—this is the reality. BTC might still have a chance to regain its strength, but for mainstream coins like BNB, returning to their all-time highs? It's very challenging.

Honestly, I am more optimistic about BNB than other cryptocurrencies. ETH? Let's keep some distance for now. There are many reasons, including technical ecology, application scenarios, market heat, and more, all worth comparing.

If BNB can surpass ETH early, that would truly indicate a change in the market landscape. Of course, as an ordinary trader, I can only explore along with the market. But this kind of benchmarking analysis is always meaningful. The market is changing, and our judgments need to adjust accordingly.

XPL-2.75%

BTC0.3%

BNB1.27%

ETH2.25%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityLarry

· 01-11 10:49

Eighteen minutes to exchange for 210U—what era's dream is that? Now earning 200 per month still requires sneaking around to be happy. BNB surpassing ETH? Wake up, brother, it's not that simple. Earning 200U in a month? I think you're joking or serious. The exchange data is right there; dreaming of going back is basically impossible. I also believe in BNB, but surpassing ETH is indeed a bit of a fairy tale. Those waiting for a rebound are probably too caught up to realize it. Earning 200 per month is indeed good, but don't expect XPL to return to that price level. No matter how strong the BNB ecosystem is, it's unlikely to surpass ETH; that's just the reality. These days, anyone who can reliably earn 200U a month is basically a master.

View OriginalReply0

InfraVibes

· 01-09 17:25

170 minutes suddenly become 200U a month, the gap is incredible... Can't really go back anymore. BNB surpassing ETH? I think it's a stretch, but BTC still has a chance. Who dares to go all-in on the all-time high now?

View OriginalReply0

VibesOverCharts

· 01-08 12:57

The era of exchanging 170 for 210U is gone forever... Now, earning 200U a month is a blessing, and reality is so harsh. BNB surpassing ETH? Ha, I’m waiting for that day too, but it depends on market sentiment. Don’t dream of returning to all-time highs; the data is right there, wake up everyone. This round of BNB really has something, ETH, take it slow first. The market has changed, and our judgments need to shift accordingly, or we’ll just be living in a dream. The days of XPL will not come back, now we need to learn to survive within the new logic. BTC still has hope, but do mainstream coins want to return to their peak? Wake up and sleep.

View OriginalReply0

0xSleepDeprived

· 01-08 12:57

The days of exchanging 170 chips for 210 U are truly gone, and now earning 200 a month makes me secretly happy. BNB surpassing ETH? Just thinking about it is exciting, but the data is what it is.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdviser

· 01-08 12:49

Those days when 170 points could exchange for 210U are really gone forever. Now you have to celebrate if you can squeeze out 200U. That hits hard.

View OriginalReply0

Layer2Observer

· 01-08 12:36

The data is here. XPL changed from 170 to 210, and now earning 200 per month is considered pretty good? What does this gap indicate? It just means liquidity is shrinking. Interestingly, everyone is still hoping to return to last year's market conditions, and this mindset definitely needs adjustment. BNB surpassing ETH? Let me check the on-chain data before making any conclusions. Making such an absolute judgment now is actually a bit premature.

View OriginalReply0