2026-01-07 13:28:14

A new development has emerged in the Bitcoin ecosystem. An independent public chain project has adopted an EVM-compatible solution, introducing Ethereum smart contract capabilities while maintaining Bitcoin's security. It sounds quite interesting.

The core selling point of such projects is "native decentralization," in other words, abandoning the old approach of centralized custody and asset wrapping. Achieving lossless cross-chain transfer of BTC through this approach indeed avoids many troubles compared to some bridging solutions.

From a technical perspective, it's also worth noting. Compatibility with EVM means Solidity developers can migrate seamlessly, deploy applications quickly, and lower the barriers to ecosystem development. For teams looking to build in the Bitcoin ecosystem but not wanting to relearn a new programming language, this is clearly a good option.

From the perspective of Layer 1 independent public chains, these solutions are trying to address how to protect Bitcoin itself while also leveraging the maturity of Ethereum's DeFi ecosystem. How this track will evolve in the future depends on the actual implementation and application.

BTC-0.85%

ETH-1.42%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BearMarketBuilder

· 01-09 05:06

It's the same EVM compatibility again, this time on Bitcoin. It looks good, but actually implementing it is another story. Another new story to cut leeks. Lossless cross-chain, huh? Just listen. Seamless migration for Solidity developers? I've heard this claim too many times. And what’s the result? Still various problems. In the BTC ecosystem, every project wants a piece of the pie. Let’s see who can survive and come out on top. By the way, can this really solve the pitfalls of bridges, or will it be attacked again? Lossless cross-chain sounds very tempting, but I’m just worried it’s another PPT that can’t be realized.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiLeftOnRead

· 01-08 17:57

Another emerging star in the Bitcoin ecosystem, EVM compatibility indeed lowers the development threshold, but whether it can truly be implemented remains a question. Lossless cross-chain sounds great, but it's uncertain whether the security testing is robust enough. These types of solutions are crowded, and it feels like they are all vying for the same territory. Who can win is really hard to predict. I am optimistic about Solidity developers migrating seamlessly, which will help the ecosystem grow quickly. With such fierce competition in the Bitcoin ecosystem, new projects need real application support to break through; just talking about technology isn't enough. Sounds good, but there are too many projects like this now, and only a few are truly usable. Decentralized custody is well explained, avoiding the risks of centralized parties, which is the right way to go.

View OriginalReply0

RunWhenCut

· 01-07 13:57

It's the same EVM-compatible setup again; every project says this. In the end, it still depends on whether it can truly take off. The BTC ecosystem indeed needs this kind of thing, but I have to question the statement about lossless cross-chain. It's easy to talk about... Migrating Solidity developers is indeed convenient, but the real bottleneck still lies on the application side. No matter how good the infrastructure is, if no one uses it, it's useless. I like this idea, but it's too early to draw conclusions now. Let's wait a few months and see the real data. Another project trying to combine BTC security with the ETH ecosystem. This track is really hot... Lossless cross-chain sounds too idealistic. How it will actually turn out still needs to be verified. Don't get blinded by marketing hype. It seems like there are more and more projects like this. The competition is fierce. The ones that really succeed will still depend on technology and ecosystem operation. Abandoning bridges sounds comfortable, but is the cost of decentralization really low? Or is it just a different way to cut?

View OriginalReply0

BearHugger

· 01-07 13:50

Is it really lossless with the EVM compatibility? I don't believe it. --- Sounds good, but what about bridge risks? It still depends on how it performs in practice. --- I support abandoning custodianship, but I'm worried it might just be all talk and no action. --- Seamless migration for Solidity developers is indeed attractive, saving the trouble of learning a new language. --- The Bitcoin ecosystem is so competitive; it feels like new things pop up every week. --- Ultimately, it's about applications. No matter how good the technology is, without traffic, it's just a sword without a master. --- Decentralization is always loudly proclaimed, but few truly achieve it. --- Is EVM compatibility universal? Will it just duplicate the Ethereum ecosystem?

View OriginalReply0

ser_ngmi

· 01-07 13:36

It's the same EVM-compatible setup again; it feels like every new public chain is hyping this concept. Lossless cross-chain sounds good, but how does it actually perform? Let's wait and see how it gets implemented. The BTC ecosystem is so competitive; how many projects can truly survive?

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 01-07 13:33

It's the same approach again—EVM compatibility + lossless cross-chain, sounds like a master key, but what's the reality? Wait, to put it simply, it's still a gamble on whether this thing can survive.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseMortgage

· 01-07 13:30

Another new play in the BTC ecosystem, this time relying on EVM compatibility to mine for gold? Feels like this approach is a bit old-fashioned. Lossless cross-chain sounds good, but how many projects are truly usable? Seamless migration for Solidity developers is a decent selling point, at least lowering the barrier to entry and avoiding starting from scratch. The key is implementation; just talking about technical stories, anyone can make them up. Can it actually run is the real skill.

View OriginalReply0