Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Recently, there's been an interesting discussion: what is the ultimate goal of Ethereum?
Many people think it's performance—faster transactions, cheaper Gas. But Vitalik's recent perspective challenges this understanding. He emphasizes that the core goal of Ethereum is actually **resilience**.
In other words: the ability to survive and remain stable.
How to understand this? Decentralization, permissionless, censorship resistance—these three are the foundational principles. This means that Ethereum must ensure that the network doesn't collapse and user assets aren't frozen when facing infrastructure failures, political risks, or systemic shocks. This is the true moat.
Only after securing this defense line can we talk about expanding block space and increasing capacity. The order is reversed; no matter how fast or cheap it is, it doesn't matter—if one day accounts are frozen or nodes are shut down by some authority, then performance metrics become a joke.
This way of thinking also provides insights for the entire Web3 ecosystem.
---
Really, people obsessing over TPS every day need to wake up.
---
That's why Ethereum has lasted so long and maintains strong resistance.
---
Exactly, if the resistance to censorship is gone, what's the use of being cheap?
---
I just want to know if those L2 solutions are still considering this issue.
---
The core is always about not being eliminated; everything else is a bonus.
---
Resilience vs. performance, Vitalik really understands this trade-off well.
---
Technologists can easily lose their way; this is a timely reminder.