Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Interesting governance progress has arrived. The community vote for a well-known crypto project WLFI has concluded—with a support rate of 77.75%. The community agrees to use some of the unlocked treasury funds to incentivize the adoption of USD1 within the ecosystem.
What does this indicate? It actually reflects the community's recognition of the infrastructure development of stablecoins. Many are discussing that the project team is doing this to accelerate the liquidity and application scenarios of stablecoins, attracting more users to participate in the USD1 ecosystem through incentive mechanisms.
A voting ratio exceeding 75% indicates that the community consensus is relatively clear. From a governance perspective, the approval of such proposals also demonstrates the trend of community-driven decision-making in projects—major events are no longer driven solely by the project team but involve listening to token holders' voices. For friends interested in participating in Web3 project governance, this is also a good case study.
The incentive for the USD1 ecosystem is a cliché; the key is whether it can truly generate liquidity.
Decentralizing governance sounds good, but will it still be dominated by big players?
---
Building a solid stablecoin infrastructure is indeed essential; otherwise, liquidity becomes a bottleneck.
---
This governance approach is good; at least it's not solely decided by the project team. Listening to token holders' opinions is more reliable.
---
Web3 governance case studies, while not perfect yet, are heading in the right direction.
---
The treasury incentive for the USD1 ecosystem has a clear logic behind it, and it's normal for community consensus to be so high.
---
Compared to centralized projects making unilateral decisions, this kind of voting is at least more transparent.
---
What does the 77.75% figure really mean? It’s worth thinking carefully about.
---
The liquidity and application scenarios for stablecoins are finally being seriously developed by some projects.