Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
AI
Gate AI
Your all-in-one conversational AI partner
Gate AI Bot
Use Gate AI directly in your social App
GateClaw
Gate Blue Lobster, ready to go
Gate for AI Agent
AI infrastructure, Gate MCP, Skills, and CLI
Gate Skills Hub
10K+ Skills
From office tasks to trading, the all-in-one skill hub makes AI even more useful.
GateRouter
Smartly choose from 30+ AI models, with 0% extra fees
By the end of this year, a highly followed political background Token WLFI experienced significant turbulence. This Token issued by World Liberty Financial, supported by a well-known figure, was very popular when it first launched—nearly $1 billion in volume during the first hour, with the price reaching a high of $0.30 at one point. Sounds exciting, right? But the subsequent story was not so glorious.
Since the beginning of the year, WLFI has dropped by about 40%, currently oscillating in the range of 0.15-0.20 USD. This decline seems significant, but the reasons behind it are actually quite interesting—not simply a cooling of speculation, but rather a design flaw in the Token itself.
WLFI has adopted a mechanism that is non-transferable in the first year. It sounds like it's meant to protect early investors, but in reality, it has cornered itself. This design has directly led to most transactions shifting to less liquid packaged versions, resulting in more severe price fluctuations and higher risks. Early buyers in the over-the-counter market have seen this situation and have chosen to exit.
This case actually reminds us of a very simple truth: the long-term performance of a Token truly depends on its mechanism design, rather than the hype at the time of launch. If the mechanism is unreasonable, no matter how good the story is, it will be hard to sustain.
If the mechanism is bad, don’t blame the market for being ruthless; this lesson is profound enough.
Locking transfers for the first year? They really think investors are fools... No wonder the Rug Pull happened so quickly.
No matter how amazing the story is, it can't save a garbage mechanism; that's the truth.
This non-transferable trick is really something, killing oneself slowly.
A 40% fall is still cheap; this kind of design should drop to zero.
It's yet another project with a false sense of self-worth; investors are not stupid.