Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Arkham has just completed a wave of efficient product iterations—launching 6 major features within 25 days, covering core needs of the data tracking platform from mobile applications, decentralized trading integration, API access permissions, to one-click alert systems.
The current market valuation of $107 million seems reasonable given its tracking scale: 12 trillion dollars in tagged trading volume across over 500,000 entity accounts. Comparing with competitors, Nansen was valued at $750 million during its 2021 funding round, with relatively limited data coverage at that time.
In this context, ARKM at a price point of $0.195 still appears to have room for growth. Rapid iteration + deep data + improved user tools—this combination is rare in the data tracking space.
If we really compare it to Nansen, ARKM is indeed undervalued
Bringing together mobile and API, this aims to fully grasp the entire on-chain data ecosystem
0.195 can still be bought, let's see if it can fall back down to enter a position again
The valuation of ARKM does look a bit low, with a traffic scale of 1.2 trillion right there, $0.195 really isn't expensive.
---
Nansen's valuation of $750m back then, just laugh it off now. The key is whether ARKM's data depth can hold up
---
Wait, 1.2 trillion in tracked traffic across 500,000 accounts, can this really be tracked to the end? Will there be omissions?
---
$0.195 is indeed cheap, but cheap things usually have their reasons. Can someone tell me why it hasn't taken off?
---
Haha, another "valuation still has room," how many times have we heard this...
---
Rapid iteration is a highlight, but will opening API permissions become a hidden risk?
---
Comparing 500,000 active accounts to the total market cap, it doesn't seem that exaggerated
---
Mobile + API + alert system combo is indeed complete, just see if it can continue to iterate in the future
---
Compared to Nansen back then? That's a story from a different era; the market has long changed
---
Honestly, ARKM's iteration speed is good, but the price increase is still slow, a bit of a pity
Nansen's valuation of 750 million back then does seem high now. The ARKM comparison is still interesting.
0.195 is indeed cheap, but the key is whether the data quality can hold up.
Fast iteration doesn't necessarily mean the direction is right; we still need to see if users will truly pay.
With $1.2 trillion in traffic data, can this thing be monetized?
Why does it feel like all data tracking projects are just bragging about their tracker coverage?
With ARKM's current price, it seems like a bet on whether its ecosystem can take off.
Will the API become so open that it gets flooded everywhere? That's a question.
Tracking 500,000 accounts sounds impressive, but how much of that data is truly valuable?
Rapid iteration is an advantage, but don't turn it into feature bloat.
Nansen raised $750 million that year and was still bragging; now they've been pressed to the ground and rubbed in.
At $0.195, honestly, it depends on whether they can sustain the momentum of this iteration.
A tracking scale of 1.2 trillion sounds impressive, but how much can actually be monetized remains a question.
There are only a few players in the data platform track; there's not much room for new innovations.