#美国人工智能行动计划 This market, to put it simply, depends on whether you dare to take action. Being timid will only let you watch others make money; only those who are truly bold know the taste of profit.



I recently noticed something quite strange - a trader hit a winning streak 18 times, turning an initial capital of 3000U into almost 30000. My first reaction was: what kind of cheat is this person using?

Upon careful observation, it turns out that his moves are not frequent, and he is not greedy, taking action only when necessary. But the strange thing is - he has never missed an opportunity.

Later we chatted for a bit, and he threw me a line: "I never guess whether prices will rise or fall; I only focus on one thing — where those impulsive funds will cluster."

What is impulsive capital? It refers to the kind of funds that chase after sudden price surges and dare to buy into false breakouts. When you see a sudden inexplicable spike on the chart, it is mostly this batch of emotional money pushing it.

His playing style is quite extreme:
- Do not predict the trend
- Only recognize two entry signals
- Even common indicators are too lazy to look at.
- Set your stop-loss and take-profit and then don't move it, execute like a machine.

I also tried operating with this mindset for two weeks, and I didn't lose in 9 attempts. The profits aren't substantial, but it made me realize something important: what's truly crucial isn't where you enter the market, but rather—do you understand who this wave of liquidity is going to harvest.

It's pointless to say this too much.

Those who understand can tell at a glance which pit the funds are being drawn into just by looking at the K-line; those who do not understand will always be led by emotions, experiencing one round of liquidation after another.

Stop asking about what the "winning indicator" is, it doesn't exist. This market has never been about reaction speed, but rather about who can anticipate where the impulsive funds will go and get into position in advance.
ZEC3.8%
ETH1.77%
TNSR4.05%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
GateUser-1a2ed0b9
· 2025-11-22 22:14
Well, I somewhat agree with this logic; understanding human nature is much more useful than understanding charts.
View OriginalReply0
GhostInTheChain
· 2025-11-21 03:00
18 consecutive hits? Come on, how lucky do you have to be... No, wait, my buddy's right, the real skill is seeing who's being cut.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTrader
· 2025-11-21 02:56
This trap theory sounds beautiful, but I think most people still overestimate their ability to understand human nature.

To be honest, how much of that guy's 18 out of 18 can be attributed to luck?

Let me also try doing things without looking at the indicators.
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 2025-11-21 02:54
Speaking the truth, understanding the flow of funds is the real skill.

---

18 consecutive hits? This guy is purely steady-minded. Most people would have been overwhelmed by emotions long ago.

---

Not predicting the trend is truly impressive. Most people just get ruined by guesswork.

---

9 times without loss, this trading approach definitely has some substance. The key is to see through those impulsive moves.

---

Set your stop-loss and take-profit orders properly, and let the machine execute. It sounds simple, but actually doing it is extremely difficult.

---

I feel this is the essence of trading, not some indicator being praised to the skies.

---

People asking about the "Must Win" indicator probably haven't even started trading yet.

---

Just look at the candlestick charts to know where the funds are heading; how does that sound like mysticism?

---

Two weeks, 9 times without loss. Still got some luck, I suppose?

---

This fresh perspective on where impulsive funds are piling in—give it a try.
View OriginalReply0
GweiObserver
· 2025-11-21 02:52
To be honest, I agree with the logic of this "monitoring impulsive funds," but how ruthless it really is to execute. Most people will still chase when they see a rally, and they simply can't stop.
View OriginalReply0
WenAirdrop
· 2025-11-21 02:41
You're right, the key is not to follow the crowd blindly, you need to have your own rhythm.

This guy's thinking is indeed brilliant, he doesn't look at indicators but focuses on the flow of funds, it sounds simple but really requires market sense. I've pondered over it, and I feel that most people are still being held back by emotions.

Saying that you got 18 out of 18 right is easy, but it takes a lot of observation and accumulation behind it. However, his point really hit home—positioning in advance is always more profitable than reacting quickly.

This wave of $ETH's pump looks like impulsive funds piling up, how it goes from here we will continue to watch.

What a tough guy, I can't learn to not predict market trends, I still need to look at Candlestick to find a sense.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 2025-11-21 02:39
18 times in a row? Buddy, this isn't a probability issue, it's about seeing what the market maker is doing.

------

To be honest, chasing emotional trades really makes you easy to get played for a sucker, I've learned this lesson myself.

------

This theory sounds harsh, but the problem is—ordinary people can't see where the impulsive funds are heading, it's easy to say.

------

Not predicting the market trend is actually the hardest part, human nature tends to make wild guesses.

------

Honestly, I also considered this approach before, but when executing it, I still get carried away by emotions, it really requires iron discipline.

------

Those who understand liquidity have already entered a position, while we are still looking for indicators down below, it's truly two different worlds.

------

9 times without a loss, is that luck or does he really have a method? Let's continue to increase the sample size.

------

Executing like a machine sounds nice, but who can really do it?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin