#美SEC促进数字资产监管创新 With a principal of 30k rolling to 10 million, looking back on this journey, I found the most counterintuitive point: the less you do, the more stable your earnings often are.



The timeline is as follows —
In the first two years, from 30,000 to 1,200,000, I watched the market every day like I was at work.
A year later, 1.2 million rose to 6 million, and I began to understand how to do subtraction.
In the last five months, 6k surpassed 10 million, at that time I might have only checked the market three times a week.

The turning point is that I condensed all strategies into one form: the N-shaped structure.

How to look at it specifically? Vertical lines rise, diagonal lines pull back, and then break through the previous high again — after these three stages are completed, I only take action when the pattern is confirmed. Once it breaks, I leave without asking for reasons. Stop loss is set at 2%, take profit at 10%, I never average down, I never hold positions, and I don't even touch leverage.

I only keep a 20-day moving average for the technical indicators, and I set it to semi-transparent. Every morning before ten o'clock, I open the exchange, take a quick look at the four-hour K-line chart, without any shape analysis software. If there are shapes, I place orders. The whole process takes no more than five minutes.

How to manage money also has its nuances. When it reached 1.2 million, I first withdrew the principal to buy a peace of mind; after it rose to 6 million, I took out half to allocate into funds and fixed income products; the rest continued to roll in the market. That way, even if there is a sudden deep correction, the worst that can happen is a shrink in profits, without hurting the fundamentals.

Over the years, I've summed up three dead rules that have saved me countless times:
Do not chase coins that have already skyrocketed, do not stubbornly hold onto positions that have broken support, and do not cling to trades in obviously reversing markets.

If the trend is right, get in; if the signal is wrong, get out; no other nonsense.

$XAN $STRK
XAN-8.43%
STRK-2.75%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
GasFeeLady
· 2025-11-22 00:23
honestly the n-pattern sounds clean but like... timing gas prices right hits different when you're actually exiting? watched so many degens get liquidated chasing that perfect breakout lol. the half transparent 20ma is giving "i know exactly when the rug's coming" energy ngl
Reply0
fomo_fighter
· 2025-11-21 15:21
It looks like another survivor bias story, but the N-shaped pattern is indeed quite interesting. The only concern is that by the time most people see this money-making story, they've already missed the best time to get in.
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickster
· 2025-11-21 01:11
Oh, I saw a similar N-shaped pattern play back in 2017, and it wasn't as detailed back then. To put it simply, it's strictly stop loss + restraining desires; most people end up losing because they can't resist the urge.
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942
· 2025-11-19 04:09
Hmm... this N-shaped pattern sounds good, but how many can really stick to it? Most people still can't help but leverage.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCry
· 2025-11-19 04:03
Hey, this trap N-shaped pattern does sound a bit interesting, but I think the real key is that mindset shift—from watching the market every day to checking it three times a week. Isn't that the essence of trading?
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 2025-11-19 03:51
It sounds perfect in theory, but out of ten people, it’s hard to find even one who can truly execute this discipline. I watched it once, and the most impressive part is not the N-shaped pattern, but the mindset—most people simply can't run after losing 2%, always thinking "just wait a little longer," and as a result, they end up losing everything.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observer
· 2025-11-19 03:49
It sounds like a hindsight narrative... Can the real situation be reproduced? It remains to be further verified. However, the idea of layered capital extraction is indeed interesting; from an engineering perspective, it is risk isolation, and this part of the logic holds up.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityWorker
· 2025-11-19 03:48
Checking the market three times a week and going from 600 to tens of millions? Is this guy for real or just another fantasy story? It's a bit ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatcher
· 2025-11-19 03:44
Amazing, going from being a market-watching maniac to checking three times a week, this contrast is a bit extreme. The key is restraint, right? It's easy to say but incredibly hard to do.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 2025-11-19 03:42
How does it sound? Really doing less and earning more? Why do I feel like this guy is a case of survivor bias? Out of millions, he succeeded, what about the others?
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin