JUST IN: Electrum released 4.8.3 to fix a flaw that let malicious servers redirect Bitcoin ($BTC ) payments through fake fee bumps.
Confirmed thefts have already happened.

Trade to Draw, Unlock XAUT & SLVON Prize Pools https://www.gate.com/campaigns/6565?ch=8756&ref=VLARBF1YAG&ref_type=132

myself when open @tradingview

The Weekend Dip – Is NVDA Priming for a Rebound or a Breakdown?
$NVDA ‌
Nvidia (NVDA) is currently hovering in a precarious position during weekend trading, sitting at $211.00. After a sharp rejection from the $222 level, the stock has bled out over the past few sessions, testing critical support. With the MACD showing bearish momentum but signs of exhaustion, traders are left asking: Is this a healthy pullback for a dip-buy, or the start of a deeper correction?
Trade Plan (Intraday/Swing Focus)
· Current Bias: Bearish to Neutral (short-term). The trend is down, and we are currently in a cons

$IN One day buried the FOMO buyers—down 14.83% in 24h, plunging straight from 0.0353 to 0.0278, now at 0.0280, with 45.7M in trading volume. This isn't a pullback; it's pinning the longs who piled in yesterday to the ground and grinding them down.
Reviewing my trade: I entered at 0.0332, based on a breakout above the previous high + rising volume, but ended up buying during the hottest five minutes of sentiment. Half an hour after entry, it climbed to 0.0348. I didn't take profit, and my mindset shifted from “short-term arbitrage” to “let's hold for a big move.” Then it steadily declined all t

These two candlesticks had me nearly falling asleep watching them—$BTC BTC just drew a flat line while ETH sat on the can. For a moment, I wondered if the exchange had switched its servers to power-saving mode.
BTC’s 24-hour range was 2.33%, swinging all the way from 79,220 to 81,099, only to end up nowhere; ETH fared even worse, hovering around 2,337, just over a hundred bucks above a certain whale/institution’s ETH long liquidation price of 2,181. This whale is sitting on $396.5 million in BTC+ETH longs and urgently topped up its margin with 9.21 million USDC in the early hours, yanking the

#SpotGoldFallsBelow$4000

Spot Gold Falls Below 4000 as Investors Reassess the Global Economic Outlook
Spot gold falling below the 4000 level marks an important moment for precious metals markets, drawing attention to changing investor expectations, global economic conditions, and the balance between risk and opportunity. Gold has traditionally served as a store of value during periods of uncertainty, but even the strongest long term assets experience corrections when market conditions shift. A decline of this magnitude can influence portfolio decisions, trading strategies, and expectations

Trade to Draw, Unlock XAUT & SLVON Prize Pools https://www.gate.com/campaigns/6565?ch=8756&ref=VLARBF1YAG&ref_type=132

Major events coming up within 10 days:
① Goldman Sachs cuts its KOSPI index forecast by 25%; bearish calls on the market keep coming, and next week will basically decide its fate
② The Fed’s rate decision is announced at 2:00 a.m. on the 29th
③ U.S. September core PCE at 20:30 on the 29th
④ The midterm elections on November 3
⑤ When will the strikes in Europe, led by France, end?
These events may seem unrelated, but they are all inseparable from inflation;
Although Trump is running around to campaign for the Republicans, if oil prices aren’t brought down, defeat is basically certain;
Likewise,

#WCTCS9 #SuccinctSP1Vulnerability When a Proof Passes Verification, Does It Always Prove the Execution Was Valid?
In zero-knowledge technology, trust depends on one critical rule: a verifier must reject an invalid proof, even when that proof is carefully crafted to look legitimate. Succinct’s SP1 vulnerability exposed a weakness in that rule, highlighting why the smallest validation checks can carry enormous importance for blockchain infrastructure.
The issue affected SP1’s native Rust verifier across versions 6.0.0 through 6.8.0. According to the GitHub security advisory GHSA-p7v2-jjv3-8p8f,

Who can tell me what the deal is with Tian Qingyue being pushed to me every day??$XAUUSD

Work three days a week and earn 10,000 RMB a month.
Singapore restaurant salaries, for those coming to Singapore to work as a reference.

This trade paid off—tonight I can finally order pork belly at the barbecue. I’d been watching $SKYAI for days. Rebound volume had dried up completely, so I set a 25x short at 0.03852 ahead of time.
Risk capped; let the market do its thing. When I checked this afternoon, the price was 0.03454, with unrealized gains of +253.36%. The price action under pressure at the lows gave us the answer. The wait paid off—the tokens that couldn’t find support at the highs finally broke down.
Don’t let profits go to your head, and don’t despair over drawdowns. Profits are the payoff for what you know; losses

Why can a trading strategy work in a ranging market but fail in a trending market?
Have you ever encountered this situation?
A trading strategy performs well over the past few weeks. It sells when prices rise and buys when they pull back, earning returns through repeated trades.
But suddenly, one day, the market starts rising steadily, and the original strategy keeps selling, missing the subsequent move; or the market continues to fall, and the strategy repeatedly tries to catch the bottom, triggering stop-losses in a row.
The problem may not lie with the strategy itself, but with a change in

At this level, I’m not making a move; I’ll stay on the sidelines and run the numbers.
First, the long: entry at 80487.6, with the stop-loss no lower than 79192.8.
That’s a 1295-point gap, enough to give back in one go everything ground out over five hours.
The target is 80991.5, just 504 points away.
The risk-reward ratio is 0.39 to 1. I’m not donating that money.
Now the short: stop-loss above 80991.5, target at 79192.8.
On paper, the ratio is 2.57 to 1, six times better than the long.
But that floor was swept out by a 6x-volume candle at 23:00 last night.
When a floor has just been swept, st

Why Does More Frequent Trading Make It Easier to Underestimate the Impact of Costs on Long-Term Returns?
When reviewing their trades, many traders focus only on the buy price, sell price, and profit or loss, while overlooking a factor that continuously affects account performance: trading costs.
The cost of a single trade may seem small, but as the number of trades increases, these costs can gradually erode an already limited profit margin.
I. A Small Per-Trade Cost Does Not Mean a Small Long-Term Impact
Suppose a trader pays an average of 0.1% of the trade amount in combined fees and slippage

1.1M $GRVT bought on the open market and permanently burned.
Not parked in a treasury. Burned via the contract. ~1% of circulating supply removed forever. Verifiable on-chain with hashes on their public dashboard.
This is step 1 of 5 toward Grvt 2.0 (late November) the first investing app where you earn and trade from a single self-custodial balance.
Here’s the actual roadmap:
• Grvt Earn (late Oct) Tokenized fixed-income strategies targeting up to 11% (not guaranteed). Backed by real asset cash flows (interest, premiums, invoices). Self-custodial.
• Stable Funding Perps (Nov) Stocks, FX, c

$TRIA The coin is going down
Sell 0.002565 0.002580; targets 0.002535 0.002510 0.002485; stop loss 0.002610