Who wants to trench with the boys ?
3 trench warriors .
Would pick from cm .

【$BTC Signal】Long + 1H breakout/4H momentum expansion
$BTC 1H breakout, 4H MACD histogram 95.4 expanding. Current price 76709.8 is hugging the 1H Bollinger upper band at 76793.0, while 1H RSI at 57.73 has not entered overbought territory. The 1H MACD histogram at 2.9 is also strengthening, with momentum aligned across both timeframes. The order book buy/sell depth ratio is 0.25, with dense sell orders above, while the current price remains elevated. Funding rate 0.0100%, OI Stable, and low leverage crowding. The stop-loss is about 1.0% from the upper bound, with a 1.5 risk-reward ratio. The od

【$ETH Signal】1H momentum weakening, short at the resistance zone
$ETH 1H RSI 47.74, MACD green bars expanding, current price 2437.85 below EMA20/50, latest hourly buy ratio 0.39.
4H red bars shrinking, upper Bollinger Band at 2522.3532 remains unbroken, 1H middle band at 2448.4950 providing resistance. Order book bid/ask 2.47, lower support orders are not thin, so chasing shorts could easily get swept by a rebound; place orders at 2430.5365 - 2437.8500, stop loss at 2462.2285, with sufficient room.
🎯Direction: Short
⚡Entry/limit order: 2430.5365 - 2437.8500
🛑Stop loss: 2462.2285
🚀Target 1:

This was once the best coin on chain
What happened?

$PI Those lacking fortune fail first; those with restless hearts fall into chaos first.

$FB Looks like it will definitely drop to 0.3 today

I didn’t make any particular judgment—I just let it run a little longer. I didn’t expect it to really deliver.

When I opened the charts this morning, $PRL was clearly under pressure at the highs, with a strong bull-trap feel; every test higher was weak. At the time, I only suggested trying a short on PRL around 0.33936, without overcomplicating things.

And it really delivered: 0.10859, +1337.31% secured. It dragged its feet at first, but the move was truly rewarding. Good enough for a nice meal.

Close 80% first, and protect the remaining 20% at the entry price. Take profits when it’s ti

After $LAB surged to 0.05108, I instead took profits on 70% first. It’s not that I’m bearish, but this level is right around the key prior-high resistance, making it less cost-effective to keep chasing. The move up from 0.05001 formed a breakout-pullback-rebreakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. After the breakout, only if it pulls back on declining volume and holds the upper boundary will that establish a new entry setup; if it merely pushes above and then fal

Imagine being down 90% on a $3.8k mcap entry 😂

$ZEC It surged 13 points in one day. Would you dare chase it at 1472? I’ve already locked my stop-loss at 1300.
First, let’s look at the chart. ZEC went straight from the low of 1301 to 1516, with 4.35 billion in 24-hour trading volume. That’s not volume retail investors can generate. At 1472, there’s only $44 of room to the daily high. 1516 is the first resistance level today, followed by the 1550-1580 range, a previous high-volume trading zone. Technically, this is a bullish breakout candle backed by heavy volume, but the problem is that it has already moved too far away from the 5-day movin

Day 37 of live trading, currently out of the market. $ONE pulled this wick from 0.0009 to 0.0024 before dumping back to 0.0020. 24-hour volume doubled to 610 million—I can smell blood.
Let me lay out the plan: This move in ONE is a typical low-level volume explosion; the 0.0009 low was most likely a wick to shake out holders. At 0.0020, it's stuck in the middle, which is the most uncomfortable place to be.
My move: place a bid at 0.0018 to go long, with a 2% position. Stop-loss at 0.0015—if it breaks below, I’ll admit I was wrong. Take profit in two stages: first target near the previous high

After $ZHIPU surged to 96.92, I instead took 70% off first. It’s not that I’m bearish, but this level is right at the key prior-high resistance, so the risk-reward of chasing higher has deteriorated. The move up from 85.41 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. If, after breaking through, price pulls back on declining volume and holds the upper boundary, that would create a new entry setup; if it only spikes above and then falls

I watched it for ages, and the more I looked, the less I dared to act. In the end, it proved that staying put was the right move.
A few days ago before bed, $GRVT had a strong bull-trap vibe, the volume didn’t follow, and the overhead resistance was crushing. I said to stay bullish and not switch sides recklessly, and to hold the short position firmly.
Entry at 0.2933, current price 0.1787, +759.93%—that gave the answer outright. It was genuinely sluggish at first, but the outcome was genuinely sweet.
Close 80% first, and protect the remaining 20% at the entry price. If it keeps dropping, let

JUST IN: U.S. approves key Iranian officials to travel to NYC for UNGA, with travel restrictions in place.
Implication: diplomacy near-term could influence market sentiment around Iranian-related risk assets and geopolitical headlines. $BTC $ETH

📈 Bitcoin Road to $90,000 May Include One More Major Higher Low
Bitcoin’s Current Range Mirrors a Key 2023 Structure as $70K–$90K Levels Come Into Focus.
Bitcoin’s long-term chart shows a recurring sequence of rally, consolidation, downside liquidity sweep, and renewed expansion. The current structure is developing between roughly $60,000 and $84,000, following the decline from the chart’s major high near $124,000–$126,000.
The chart also highlights a 2023 structure as a historical comparison. The price levels and sequence are similar in form, although the present structure is occurring at su

Watching the market nonstop got annoying, but once I turned it off, I could see things more clearly. With my eyes no longer glued to it, I stopped feeling anxious.

While the market was bottoming out, $BEAT ’s rebound remained weak, and volume failed to follow. Nobody was taking it higher, so I flagged a BEAT short setup around 0.4692. I didn’t call it too aggressively—those who understood would naturally get it.

It weakened directly afterward, and 0.0858, +1608.09% was secured. That was a satisfying bite of profit; the wait beforehand was worth it.

Take 80% off first, and protect the rem

$XAUUSD nailed it perfectly