After $BCH surged to 235.22, I instead took profits on 70% first. It’s not that I’m bearish; this level is right at the key previous-high area, so the risk-reward of chasing further has worsened. The move up from 221.80 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.
The key levels are clear now: the previous high is the first key level. If price can pull back on lower volume after the breakout and hold the upper boundary, that would create a new entry setup; if it simply pushes up and then falls back, it co

$ZEC Correction risk is rising
ZEC has surged from around $1,085 to $1,516, but the price is now showing signs of rejection/pullback near the 1,500–1,520 resistance zone. As long as this resistance holds, profit-taking could push the price lower. Immediate support: 1,440–1,450 Next support: 1,330–1,350 Main downside zone: 1,220–1,250 The rebound momentum is strong, but after such an overextended move, a healthy correction should not be overlooked. Trade $ZEC

$ONE
This level is a graveyard for bloodied chips, with bulls stubbornly defending 0.00175 while bears dump until their legs go weak😤 The current price of 0.001806 is hugging the crater, as the main players shake out the market until retail traders cry out. If it cannot hold, it goes straight to the ICU; if it stabilizes above 0.002, it will be a short-squeeze rocket🚀 Don’t wait until the meat is gone to slap your thigh in regret!

The SEC has just opened a five-year trial window for tokenized U.S. stocks—don't rush to shout “$7.7 quadrillion on-chain.”
The Innovation Exemption took effect Thursday: permissioned AMMs can trade real tokenized stocks with dividends and voting rights. OTC synthetic products that only offer price exposure are directly excluded from the framework. Reuters also stated that platforms may defer registration under traditional exchange rules for five years, but issuers have veto rights.
Token Terminal data shows that tokenized stocks have a market cap of about $3.2 billion, up approximately 1219%

After $SUI surged to 0.7631, I instead took 70% off the table first. It’s not that I’m bearish; this level is right at the key prior-high resistance, so the risk-reward of continuing to chase has deteriorated. The move up from 0.7087 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.
The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. If, after breaking through, price pulls back on declining volume and holds the upper boundary, that would be the new entry setup; if it merely spikes above and th

$BR Bearish Factors
1. Major token unlock (most critical risk)•Time: September 20 (in about 2 days)•Scale: 40.63 million BR tokens unlocked•Value: approximately $10.34 million-$12.74 million•Share: 18.68% of the circulating supply•Distribution: 25 million tokens for the founding team + 15.63 million tokens for seed investors⚠️ **Historical pattern**: Large unlocks are typically accompanied by selling pressure and price volatility
2. Highly concentrated token holdings•The top 100 wallets hold over 98% of the tokens•Whale exits will cause extremely high volatility
3. Excessively high FDV/MC rat

The @playmatejaylene leading the solana:98kfF7rmsg1QDUEoCqNE7g7M1FdrTt92TEp2CLzypump pump
98kfF7rmsg1QDUEoCqNE7g7M1FdrTt92TEp2CLzypump
#crypto #altcoins $sol

FLOCK | Bullish bias 🟢 | 15m breakout of 20 candles · Confidence: 100/100Observation: 0.07258 Invalidation: 0.0674679 (7.04%) Targets: 0.0789701 / 0.0828042 / 0.0879162RSI14: 69.9 · ADX14: 26.2 · Volume: 2.50xIf the 15m candle closes below the invalidation level, the setup is invalidated. For educational purposes only; this does not constitute financial advice. Leverage carries extremely high risk.$FLOC

$LSK For this -12.4% guillotine drop, I called for reducing positions in the group two days in advance. Don’t rush to criticize me—first see how I break down this setup from the market maker’s perspective.
Trading replay: Step one, that 0.5326 spike, the 24h high—retail traders saw a breakout, while I saw an order book as thin as paper. It took less than 2 million U to push it up, specifically to bait breakout chasers. Step two, it moved sideways above 0.52 for less than four hours, with trading volume piling up to 417M. Once turnover was sufficient, I began unloading in batches at 0.51–0.52.

XXAntiWar flips two ZEC shorts, losing $398k and wiping Hyperliquid gains; since Sep, 8 ZEC shorts across 3 addresses show a 62.5% win rate, still netting $437k overall. $ZEC

How high will it go?
In yesterday’s video, I discussed going long at 2441, and I also made an intraday trade last night. Today, I continued going long around 2440, and I’ll make another intraday trade tonight. This is how the market has been moving these days: consolidating within a range, so take it slowly.
Why am I willing to be bullish at such a high level?
Because the impact of the rate hike has already passed. Its bearish impact had already been priced in before the announcement. I said as early as Monday that the market would fall for the few days before the rate hike. Do you believe me

ARC’s mass exodus—a disaster caused by a livestream!
Data on DeFiLlama shows that Arc still had $64.35 million in trading volume on the 16th, but after appearing on livestream, it dropped directly to below $50 million on the 17th.
I have to ask: Was it really necessary to show your face?
I vaguely remember last year’s investigation by Twitter users into project teams’ locations. Many projects may have presented themselves publicly as having European, American, Hong Kong, or Singaporean backgrounds, while their actual locations showed up as places such as India.
This time, similarly, there has

Place a limit order. Brothers, gold is still at yesterday’s level.

$SKYAI I bet this move will retrace to 0.038. Posting this as proof—if you disagree, take a screenshot and come back tomorrow to prove me wrong.
Current price: 0.0510, down 16% in 24 hours, with a high of 0.0630 and a low of 0.0496, and 15.4M in trading volume. Given this volume relative to the size of the drop, this isn’t panic selling that has run its course—someone is still exiting. Looking at the on-chain data, two of the top 50 addresses have been continuously selling in the 0.058-0.062 range, with every rebound being pushed back down. I’ve seen this structure too many times: a typical di

$$UNI I chased heavily at 7.12 and exited at 7.85—this 14-point move was purely because I chickened out. When it hit the 6.61 low yesterday, my limit order wasn’t filled, and I could only watch it surge to 7.9. Trading volume was 600 million, with intense turnover, but the 24-hour high of 7.906 is a hurdle—the reason I exited was that when it reached 7.85, volume failed to keep up, and sell orders in the order book were twice as thick as buy orders. Don’t chase at this level; wait for a pullback to 7.45–7.55 to enter, with a stop-loss at 7.2—accept the loss if it breaks below. If it takes out

After $LINK challenged the previous high and was pushed back, I didn’t rush to fully close this short. LINK repeatedly wicked into the dense resistance zone above, with volume weakening each time, showing strong signs of a false breakout. What really gave me the confidence to hold was that after breaking below the previous low, it failed to quickly reclaim it, indicating that selling pressure was still taking control of the market.
The rebound has consistently failed to hold above the short-term moving averages, and the price-volume relationship also looks poor: volume contracts on the way up