Crypto equities slide as CLARITY Act stalls in Senate; Circle, Coinbase off ~10% while miners and treasury-related names follow the spill. $BTC exposure remains a risk-on proxy for the sector.

$ETH Start over from scratch, day one

CLARITY Act Hits a Senate Roadblock
The U.S. Senate voted 49–50, falling short of the 60 votes needed to advance the bill. �
CBS News +1
But this was a procedural vote — not a final vote on the Act.
The bigger takeaway: U.S. crypto market-structure rules remain unresolved, keeping regulatory uncertainty in focus.
The bill stalled. The debate continues.
#Crypto #CLARITYAct #Regulation $BTC

【$BTC Signal】Short + 1H bearish expansion, order book depth imbalance
$BTC Order book Bid/Ask 0.13, sell-side depth outweighs buy-side depth. 4H MACD bearish crossover, 1H histogram -144.57 continues to expand. RSI 1H 26.21, 4H 38.15, rebound risk is also rising. EMA20/50 1H resistance at 77311/77530. Funding rate 0.0096%, OI Stable.
🎯Direction: Short
⚡Entry/limit order: 76109.684 - 76338.700
🛑Stop-loss: 77102.087
🚀Target 1: 75193.620
🚀Target 2: 74621.079
🛡️Trade management:
- Execution strategy: After reaching Target 1, reduce the position by 50% and move the stop-loss up to breakeven. I

The Fear and Greed Index remains in greed at 69, so why is $WLFI falling instead of rising? The answer: BTC is moving sideways with little momentum, funds are rotating into weaker sectors, and $WLFI is being drained of liquidity.
$WLFI is currently at 0.057, down 1.55% in 24h, with only 5.9M in trading volume. MA5 has crossed below MA20, RSI is weak at 45.8, the bearish MACD histogram is continuing, and the funding rate of +0.0050% shows that longs remain crowded, creating short-term pressure. Also monitor: $AEV and $CELO are relatively resilient.
Primarily bearish; enter a short on a rebound

TON: collapse or a new stage?
Posts about every little "sneeze," every statement, code findings, rumors, or community predictions:
> I could write them too, but you've probably already read 100 posts saying that any moment now it will happen and TON will become great.
Everyone's tired of it.
So let's sum it all up in one post and see where TON is heading.
Pavel Durov returns to the game after the attempted launch of $GRAM and the SEC ban in 2019:
> in April 2026, Durov, the tsar, takes the throne of TON governance and announces the 7 steps of MTONGA (Make TON Great Again) to make TON great ag

After the short trade played out, I closed most of my $SOL position, with unrealized gains of +386.67%. This was not a matter of chasing shorts; after repeated resistance at the highs and a pullback following a false breakout, I confirmed the bearish bias. After entering, the rebound lacked volume and key levels were not reclaimed, so I held according to plan.

I took profit on 80% first and am trailing the remaining 20% with a protective level. As long as the prior low is broken and not quickly reclaimed, the downtrend can continue; if the key level is reclaimed, I will close the remaining

To be honest, I’m surprised this trade has survived until now; luck played a significant part. While the market was grinding out a bottom, resistance above $ACE was obvious. Every upward push fell just short, and volume failed to follow. Seeing that it couldn’t break higher, I advised short sellers not to rush and to consider it after a rebound.
From 0.1748 to 0.1531, the short position delivered +304.41%—those already in the trade must be wide awake with excitement. Close 80% first, protect the remaining 20% at the entry price, and let the profits run as the decline continues. If it rebounds

🚨 IMPORTANT: Bitcoin fell under $75,000 but rapidly surged back above $76,000.
#CLARITYActKeyVoteAhead

lower before higher is fine btw
same result either way.
chop is still bullish in this context; pullbacks are bid opportunities
zoom out.
goodluck.

$XRP This drop of 10.98% cut me wide awake from my dream of “breaking through 1.5.”
Let me review this terrible trade. The day before yesterday, when XRP surged to 1.4916, the futures version of the Fear & Greed Index I was watching had already climbed to 78, and the funding rate had stayed strongly positive for two consecutive days, with longs lining up to send money to shorts. I got carried away and chased longs around 1.45, thinking, “Such a high funding rate means sentiment is strong; I’ll add to my position if it breaks through 1.5.” What happened? Starting yesterday, the funding rate was

#UAI is showing exactly why small-cap AI tokens can become dangerous after a major breakout: the story can remain interesting while the chart becomes extremely unstable.
The latest CoinMarketCap snapshot has UnifAI Network (UAI) around $0.3868, with a reported 24h move of +26.37%, roughly $18.3M in 24h volume and a market cap near $92.5M. The reported 24h range is $0.3794–$0.5332. I’m flagging the data-feed discrepancy because CoinDesk is currently showing a different snapshot around $0.4049 and -20.50%.
The bigger picture is much clearer than the conflicting live tick. UAI recently went throu

bitcoin:native back to 70k please 🤝
$BTC

$BTC My office today while I watch our shorts PRINT 💸
Life is good!

GPU-hours might be turning into something you hedge.
The CFTC is already exploring compute derivatives, and Liquid Compute just raised $15M to build a regulated market for GPU futures, options + swaps.
Makes sense if AI compute really grows from ~$360B in 2025 to ~$2.3T by 2030.
The weird part is standardization.
An H100-hour in one region isn’t the same product as a B200-hour somewhere else with different networking, power costs and cluster size.
So before compute gets a real futures market, someone has to invent the benchmark contract everyone agrees to trade around.
Once that exists, labs c

ethereum:native
Re-longing ethereum:native here on this 4hr close.
We remain at ascending support within the apex.
Liquidity grab complete.
Breakout of ascending takes us to $3000+

LATEST: 🟠 Michael Saylor says "the only clarity you need is Bitcoin."
##FedAnnounceRateDecisionSoon

Perfect take-profit, care about me hahaha$ETH