Let me do a small experiment with you…
If you saw a project for the first time and it wasn’t surrounded by much hype, would you pass it by?
Or would you first ask:
Who’s building it?
What has been done so far?
What could still happen?
And is it even worth following?
I did this test with EGY.
And I’m not saying the outcome is guaranteed…
I’m saying the project is worth testing for yourself.
EGY/USDT — Gate Alpha
Not everything is worth buying.
But some things are worth a minute of your attention.
Do your own research before making any decision.
Not financial advice.
$BR
$4STOCK
$RVN
$BEAT

🚨 BREAKING: NEAR Intents Crosses $30 BILLION in All-Time Volume! 🔥
NEAR Intents has now surpassed $30B in total volume. 🌐
With:
🔹 30+ blockchain networks
🔹 100+ supported assets
🔹 More integrations continuously expanding
The ecosystem is becoming increasingly connected, making cross-chain asset swaps and transactions more accessible.
$NEAR is definitely an ecosystem to keep on the radar. 👀
#NEAR #Crypto #Blockchain #Web3 #harrycrypto

Some trades are just like this: the more you watch them, the less they move; the moment you turn away, they take off. When I checked the chart after lunch, $PRL had strong sell-side pressure, low trading volume, and heavy resistance overhead. Seeing that buying support was weak, I suggested waiting for a rebound to reassess the short position—don't chase.

From 0.33936 to 0.10621, the short position gained +1352.75%—an absolute feast. It feels so good; the earlier sluggish move finally paid off beautifully. Take 80% off the table first, protect the remaining 20% at the entry price, and let p

Stablecoins must not pay interest, and regulators are also targeting exchanges: I’m only bearish on ENA at this level
Half an hour ago, the GENIUS Act targeted exchange yield channels, with $ENA sitting at 0.1396, 24h -5%—I won’t catch a falling knife; I’m only looking short.
One sentence on the event—the GENIUS Act prohibits issuers from paying yield to holders, and Section 404 specifically targets disguised interest payments by exchanges and affiliated parties.
The transmission occurs in three steps. First, legislation has boxed in issuers’ deposit-taking channels; second, exchanges’ stable

Now you need to wish me luck!
Clarity act my ass!
Send this higher, bitcoin:native

One memecoin you can’t build a portfolio without __________ 🤔
$DOGE
$SHIB
$PEPE
$FLOKI
$PENGU

【$SOL Signal】Short + 1H breakdown continuation
$SOL 1H breakdown continuation, RSI 28.26, order book buy/sell ratio 0.88, depth imbalance -6.48%.
The MACD 1H/4H histogram is expanding downward, with price running below the 4H Bollinger middle band at 100.685. The current price of 97.08 is near the 1H lower band at 97.4894. Bearish momentum is continuing, while rebound strength is weak. The 1.50 risk/reward ratio is acceptable; position sizing takes priority.
🎯Direction: Short
⚡Entry/limit order: 96.7888 - 97.0800
🛑Stop-loss: 98.0508
🚀Target 1: 95.6238
🚀Target 2: 94.8957
🛡️Trade managemen

BREAKING: Polymarket traders price a 90% chance of a 25-basis-point Fed rate hike in September.
The odds of no change stand at 10%.

【$AKE Signal】Long + 1H pullback support, 4H momentum continuation
$AKE RSI 1H 68.38, 4H 75.99, MACD histogram contracting across both timeframes, Bid/Ask 1.00.
🎯Direction: Long
⚡Entry/Limit order: 0.02680135 - 0.02688200
🛑Stop-loss: 0.02553790
🚀Target 1: 0.02889815
🚀Target 2: 0.02990623
🛡️Trade management:
- Execution strategy: Reduce the position by 50% after reaching Target 1, and move the stop-loss up to the breakeven level. If the price falls back to the entry level, exit automatically to protect the principal.
In-depth logic: The 1H Bollinger upper band is 0.0321, and the price at 0.

$CAP This long position didn’t add immediately after entry; I first wanted to see whether CAP could hold above the previous high. Support on the pullback was stronger than expected, and the fake breakout didn’t damage the structure, so I continued holding.

After securing +14.92%, I handled it on a 70/30 basis: took 70% off first, and moved the protection level up for the remaining 30% so I wouldn’t give all the profit back. If it comes under pressure again around 0.05987, I’ll reduce a bit more.

I’m now leaning toward a bullish pullback, with clear conditions: as long as the 0.05941 area h

Epic post-CLARITY vote live show with Vlad today.
Out on all platforms later in the week.
Higher.

$IOST Current price: 0.000752, down 5.05% over 24h, funding rate -0.0494%—shorts are paying to hold positions, but the price is already near the lower Bollinger Band at 0.000744, RSI is at 41 without breaking below 30, and the MA5 and MA20 are both exerting pressure. Negative funding rate + Greed Index at 69 indicate crowded shorts rather than panic, with a relatively high risk of a wick sweeping shorts; bullish bias on a rebound.
Entry: 0.000748-0.000752 (near the lower band + negative funding rate covering)
Take-profit 1: 0.000766 (MA5 resistance)
Take-profit 2: 0.000780 (above the Bollinge

With the same 1,000U, some doubled their money on $Lobster today, while others are still playing dead in other coins. The showdown is on.
First, let's review the market. $Lobster is currently priced at 0.1932, up 21.57% over 24 hours, with a high of 0.1957 and a low of 0.1519, and a trading volume of 211.2M. Pay attention to this volume—it is not minor activity, but real money changing hands. Market sentiment is cautious today, with major coins grinding sideways, but funds in the meme sector are clearly looking for an outlet, and $Lobster is the one being selected. From 0.1519 to 0.1957, the i

CLARITY Act Stalls — Uncertainty Stays
The U.S. Senate failed to advance the CLARITY Act, falling short of the 60 votes required.
BTC, ETH, SOL and $XRP came under pressure as markets reacted to the setback.
The bigger signal: stablecoin rules now have a federal framework, but broader crypto market structure remains unresolved.
Garlinghouse argues crypto can keep building without CLARITY.
Maybe. But institutional capital still needs regulatory visibility.
The bill is stalled.
The demand for clarity isn’t.
#Crypto #Regulation #MarketStructure

Damn, even though I knew it was fake, I still couldn’t resist clicking it···· The longest-running gimmick I’ve ever gone through is freaking Pinduoduo’s free giveaway campaign···
I only managed to claim 200 once back then and never got anything again. Unless something unexpected happens, this begonia flower will keep splitting indefinitely😂. After 0.1 comes 0.01, and after 0.01 comes 0.001. This referral campaign really does acquire new users quickly, and it still costs 0, but it’s just a little disgusting😂···

The CLARITY Act just hit a major roadblock in the U.S. Senate.
The final vote came in at 49–50, well short of the 60 votes needed to move the bill forward with three Republicans joining Democrats against advancing it.
After months of negotiations, crypto market structure legislation is back in uncertainty.
For an industry waiting years for clearer rules in the U.S., this is a big setback.
The fight for regulatory clarity isn’t over, but today definitely didn’t go the way crypto wanted.
#CLARITYActKeyVoteAhead
##FedAnnounceRateDecisionSoon

#silver
Silver drifts lower ahead of the Fed as rising U.S. rates weigh on prices, with $60 and $55 support in focus while $70 remains major resistance.

#GateSquareMidAutumnReunion
The CLARITY Act vote is over, and the important part for crypto traders is not simply that the bill failed. It is how the market reacted before, during and immediately after the vote — because that price action tells us what traders had already priced in and what they are still worried about.
The U.S. Senate voted 49–50 against advancing the CLARITY Act, falling short of the 60 votes required for the procedural motion. The bill was designed to establish a federal framework for digital assets and clarify the respective roles of the SEC and CFTC. Republicans had rele