Bitcoin ETFs have recorded net outflows for the second consecutive week. Net flows over the past 30 days remain positive at +15.4K BTC, but inflows are shrinking, pointing to weakening demand.
That said, weekly net outflows have eased to 2.8K BTC.

$SUI SELLERS STILL IN CONTROL! 📉🔥
Entry: 0.9840 – 0.9920 (Short)
SL: 1.0080
TP1: 0.9740
TP2: 0.9620
TP3: 0.9520
$SUI remains bearish on the 1H chart, with lower highs keeping sellers in control. A rejection near 0.99 could trigger another move toward 0.95.
Wait for bearish confirmation before entry!

OSMO isn’t just another random green day — the structure from the 0.0438 low looks intentional.
Traders who caught the bounce are already in profit, and the order book still has room for more buyers to step in. Momentum is quietly returning.$OSMO ‌

$BTC
My higher-timeframe outlook remains unchanged. Market structure is still bullish, but I do have some concerns regarding short-term price action.
Although we are currently holding the range lows and value area, I’m not liking the H4 acceptance below the 200 MA. The amount of time we’re spending around these lows without any meaningful buying pressure is also a concern. We need to see stronger momentum develop if price is going to rotate back towards the range highs.
There is significant market inefficiency below the range lows, which could see price bleed back towards the mid-$70Ks to fill

Kitty has been obsessed with building Gundam kits lately, but always puts them together backwards... HG kits only have a few movable joints, and she’s never gotten one right... Either she presses too hard with her gorilla-grip fingers and snaps it (like this blue tiger, which ended up one-armed), or she assembles it backwards and just glues it in place😂... Daban kits that cost just over ten yuan may not be as well made as Bandai’s, but they shouldn’t be impossible to assemble... This tyrannical approach to model building has really opened my eyes😂...

$ZEC has already moved, so why hasn’t trading activity followed?
When I looked at this chart again, $ZEC , I first covered up the 24-hour -4.02%. It’s not that this number doesn’t matter, but it’s too easy for it to steal attention. What really needs explaining right now is that the $ZEC price has already moved, yet trading activity and volume haven’t kept up. We can provisionally trust the direction, but we can’t assume it will continue; a move with no one to carry it forward can be reversed at any time.
Today, let’s cover a concept you can use again and again: price-volume confirmation. Pric

$XMR - Update
Looking for shorts if we get the test at $690 as mapped out.

Today's key view: ETH is weak in the short term, with the $2,380—$2,400 support zone in focus. The preferred approach is to wait for a rebound and a short signal, but avoid blindly chasing shorts near support; only consider a short-term trend recovery if ETH regains and holds above $2,450, then breaks above $2,500.
As of the latest market snapshot available today, ETH is around $2,398.68, down about 1% over 24 hours; BTC has recently been trading around $82,000. Since today is Sunday, liquidity may be lower than on weekdays, so be especially alert to false breakouts and sudden wicks in the sho

#晒出我的持仓收益 Every opinion is backed by a real position! No armchair theorists

$MU Honor of Kings [Xishi Premium Standee 2LPEPT] worth 915 points. Copy the code to get Honor of Kings [Nezha Premium Standee A4QGDF] worth 545 points. Copy the code to get a standee, and come to Honor of Kings’ birthday party to redeem a limited-edition anniversary Legendary skin for free!

$BNB has reached 723.73 USDT, up 0.31% over 24 hours, but 1-hour trading participation is only 0.54x, suggesting some weakness. This feels a little unusual because the price has moved, but volume has not followed. The current price is already close to the 1-hour support level at 710.15, while the 1-hour resistance level at 723.99 still lies ahead.
I’d rather view this as a direction that has yet to be confirmed than rush to label it a rebound or a pullback. This looks more like a test, and whether the 1-hour bullish signal can be confirmed on the 4-hour timeframe will be key. If the 4-hour dir

NEAR at $5—would you still dare to hold it?
From $6 to $5, everyone online is shouting, “NEAR is done,” but after everyone cut their losses, it rose 45% in 30 days and doubled in a year. Cross-chain swap volume topped $34 billion, the ETF is quietly accumulating, and buybacks are using real money—so is this a normal pullback in an uptrend, or the last chance to escape before the narrative tops out?
First, the surface picture: it’s down, but it hasn’t collapsed.
Down 3% in 24 hours and 5% in 7 days, with a 17% pullback from the October 12 high of $6. Sound scary? But zoom out—and it’s up 45% in

The development trends of the current era. I am increasingly convinced that we are entering an era in which Web3🛜 and AI are deeply integrated. In today’s world, most traditional industries have gradually matured and even become saturated, while the integration of Web3 and AI is only just beginning. Just think: among the major public blockchains around the world today, how many can combine the development of Web3 and AI the way Pi Network does? In the Pi ecosystem, we can use AI to create DApps, bring popular AI Agents such as Hermes and OpenClaw into the ecosystem, and combine AI workflows w

A privacy chain had just upgraded its new pool on October 3.
Eleven days later, a vulnerability was discovered.
39.8 million coins appeared out of thin air, instantly increasing the supply by 20%.
The minted coins went straight into the shielded pool. Once they were in, they couldn’t be traced.
The team first said it would roll back to the 14th.
Then it changed its tune, saying it was decentralized
and couldn’t be rolled back.
ZEC also had an upgrade with the same name in July, which patched its own May vulnerability.
On the 13th, I was watching redemptions from that ETF.
Today, the break is o

They wouldn't sweep $60K would they...?

I was wrong last round; today, I’ll make it right.
Last night at 20:22, I wrote that $SOL had no one taking the other side, so I wouldn’t chase it—the 1.36 odds weren’t worth it.
Twenty-four hours later, it has barely moved, up 0.3%.
At 5 a.m., it plunged to 101.17, then climbed back on its own.
Where was I wrong?
I only looked at the long/short ratio, not the volume.
That plunge involved 270,000 contracts; the previous candle had only 30,000.
It was stop-loss orders resting below that got hit, not longs giving up.
Now it’s back at 104.18, just 0.54% below 104.74 overhead.
Upside 0.54%, downs

— intraday trading —
$INJ buy zone now 🟢🟢🟢