SoominStar

#NVIDIAEarnings
NVIDIA earnings are not just a company's quarterly result — they are a health check for the entire AI industry. NVIDIA is today the most valuable company in the world, and on 26 August 2026 it released its Q2 FY2027 earnings report, which came with record numbers. In this post, I will tell you everything you need to know: revenue, profit, EPS, data center growth, stock price, volume, liquidity, forecast and trading strategy — all with prices and percentages.
In Q2 FY2027, NVIDIA's total revenue was $96.22 billion, which is 106% higher than the same quarter last year ($46.74 billion) and 18% above the previous quarter ($81.62 billion). Wall Street was expecting only $92.17 billion, so the company beat expectations by 4.4%. Non-GAAP EPS came in at $2.22, which was 5.7% above the expected $2.10. GAAP net profit was $59.69 billion — a 126% jump from last year — and non-GAAP net profit was $53.95 billion, up 118%. Gross margin stands at 75%, compared with 72.4% a year ago. These numbers show that NVIDIA is not just growing — it is growing explosively.
The heart of NVIDIA is the Data Center business. This quarter, Data Center revenue reached $89 billion, which is 92% of total revenue and 117% higher than last year. Demand for Blackwell Ultra chips is so strong that supply cannot keep up. Networking revenue also set a record — Spectrum-X Ethernet networking grew 2.6x year over year. The company has stopped reporting gaming and other segments separately, but the edge computing segment is estimated at around $7.22 billion. In reality, NVIDIA has now become a pure AI infrastructure company.
The plan ahead is even more impressive. The company guided Q3 FY2027 revenue to $108 billion (plus or minus 2%), which is 4-5% above the market's estimate of $103-104 billion. Gross margin guidance is 74%, slightly below 75% due to pressure from HBM memory costs. The biggest signal is that NVIDIA is targeting 70% revenue growth in FY2028. The Vera Rubin platform has now reached Microsoft, OpenAI, Google Cloud, Oracle, CoreWeave and Nebius, and Jensen Huang has said that combined orders for Blackwell and Rubin are close to $1 trillion through 2027.
Now let's talk about the market. On 28 August 2026, NVIDIA's stock closed at $217.48, but it fell 4.58% that day — because after the big 8.56% rally the previous day, there was profit taking. In the two days after earnings, the stock's net gain was +3.6%. On a weekly basis, the stock is up 1.3%, up 8.3% over the month, and up 16.8% year-to-date in 2026. The stock is only 8.1% below its 52-week high of $236.54, while the 52-week low was $164.07. Total market cap is around $5.3 trillion — making NVIDIA the largest public company in the world.
When it comes to liquidity and volume, NVIDIA is one of the most liquid stocks in the world. On normal trading days, average volume is around 53 million shares, worth roughly $11 billion. But on earnings days, volume is on another level — on 27 August, 244 million shares were traded, worth $55.3 billion, and the next trading day still saw 162 million shares. With this kind of depth, any large institutional investor can easily enter or exit a position. Short interest is just 1.2%, meaning there are very few bearish bets in the market.
After earnings, at least 10 investment banks raised their price targets. The new target range is $300 to $515. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and UBS set targets of $300, Citi and Oppenheimer $315, JP Morgan $320, RBC and KeyBanc $330, BofA $350, Bernstein $400, Melius $420, Evercore $465, and Raymond James gave the most aggressive target of $515 — which is 137% above the current price. The average target across these banks is around $353, which is 62% above the current price of $217. No bank lowered its target, which shows market confidence.
Looking at valuation, NVIDIA still looks reasonable when measured against growth. At the expected FY2027 EPS of $9.27, the forward P/E is just 23.5x, and at the expected FY2028 EPS of $15.33, it is only 14.2x. For a company growing revenue 88% (FY2027 estimate of $406.9 billion), this P/E is very cheap. According to market consensus, FY2028 revenue could reach $671.8 billion — 65% growth. This means that if growth proves correct, the current stock level is not aggressive — it is actually behind the curve.
The technical levels are also clear. The first support is at $216.8 (the 28 August low), then $213-214 (20-day moving average), then $208 (50-day moving average), and $195 (200-day moving average). Resistance is at $229-230 (recent high), and above that is the 52-week high of $236.5. RSI is in the neutral zone at 46-52, ADX of 41.7 shows a strong trend, and the average daily range is around 2.7-3%. The stock is above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, meaning the long-term trend is still intact and the uptrend has not broken.
Now the question is how high NVIDIA can go. In the conservative scenario, the $300 level comes into play — 38% above the current price. The base case is the $315-350 range, offering 45-61% upside. The optimistic scenario is $400-515, carrying 84-137% potential. If the company delivers 70% growth in FY2028 and the P/E stays stable, the $350-400 zone is not a difficult target. And if the AI capex cycle continues through 2027-2028, some analysts consider a $500+ scenario realistic. The Q3 guidance of $108 billion is proof that growth is not slowing down.
For trading strategy, there are some key levels to remember. The $208-213 zone (near the 50-day moving average) is strong support — a bounce from there is logical. If the stock breaks above $230, it can rally to $236.5, and after that breakout the path to $250+ opens up. A simple stop-loss rule is that if the stock closes below the 50-day moving average, you should control risk, because the trend weakens there. An ATR of around 6 means daily moves of 2-3% are normal, so taking on too much leverage is risky. For long-term investors, dollar cost averaging is the better strategy, because NVIDIA's stock is very volatile in the short term — you should not enter any position without patience and proper position sizing.
There are also risks inside the story that need to be discussed. The first risk is gross margin — it could fall to 74% in Q3 and 71-72% in Q4 because HBM memory costs are rising. The second risk is export controls — China's data center revenue is no longer included in guidance at all. The third risk is the sustainability of AI capex — if hyperscalers like Microsoft, Google and Meta slow their spending, NVIDIA's growth story could take a hit. Competition is also increasing — AMD, Broadcom and Google's custom AI chips are taking market share. Customer concentration is another risk, since a few large customers account for a big share of revenue.
Now my view. NVIDIA is still the strongest company in the AI era with the best execution. 117% growth in data center, a 75% gross margin, and $1 trillion in booked orders — these are things no other company can show. Jensen Huang's roadmap (from Blackwell to Rubin) is already booked in advance, and the 70% growth target for FY2028 shows that demand is not going anywhere. In the short term, the stock may consolidate because of margin pressure and profit taking — the 4.58% fall on 28 August is an example. But the long-term picture is very clear: for those who believe in the AI trend, NVIDIA is the biggest winner of that trend. Both the conservative target of $300 and the optimistic target of $400+ look logical — all that is needed is patience and proper risk management. NVIDIA's performance speaks for itself.
$NVDA ‌

#EventContracts1%Reward BTC & ETH Prices Are Moving My Strategy for the Trading Carnival
The crypto market is creating fresh short-term opportunities, and the Event Contract Trading Carnival has arrived at a time when both Bitcoin and Ethereum are showing significant volatility.
The event runs from August 26, 14:00 to September 2, 08:00 (UTC+8) and gives traders an opportunity to participate in the 1% trading-volume reward competition while trading major cryptocurrencies.
The campaign also includes a 5.5 USDT first-trade welcome gift for eligible new users, a chance to share a 10,000 USDT prize pool by completing three days of check-ins, and trading-tier rewards of up to 70 USDT.
But for me, the most exciting part is finding real opportunities in BTC and ETH while keeping risk under control.
Bitcoin: Around $78,000
BTC is currently trading around $78,000. Recently, Bitcoin tested levels above $81,000 before experiencing a sharp pullback, showing how quickly the market can change.
The important levels I am watching are:
Current area: $78,000
Support: $77,000
Next support: $75,000
Major lower zone: $72,000–$73,000
On the upside, I am watching:
$80,000 → $81,000 → $83,000 → $85,000
From approximately $78,000:
A move to $80,000 represents around +2.6%.
A move to $83,000 represents around +6.4%.
A move to $85,000 represents roughly +9%.
My approach is to watch whether BTC can successfully reclaim the $80,000 area.
If buyers establish strength above that level, momentum could improve significantly.
But if BTC loses $77,000 with strong selling pressure, I would become more cautious.
Ethereum: Around $2,456
ETH is currently trading near $2,456. The recent price action has been highly volatile, with ETH reaching above $2,550 during the past few sessions before pulling back toward the current area.
The levels I am watching are:
Current area: $2,456
First support: $2,400
Next support: $2,300
Major resistance: $2,500–$2,550
Then:
$2,700
From approximately $2,456:
$2,500 = around +1.8%
$2,550 = around +3.8%
$2,700 = around +9.9%
For me, ETH becomes more interesting if it can reclaim and hold above the $2,500–$2,550 zone.
My Trading Approach
During this event, I am focusing on quality opportunities rather than unnecessary trading volume.
My approach is simple:
I watch the market direction first.
I identify important support and resistance.
I wait for price confirmation.
I avoid chasing sudden green candles.
And I manage risk carefully.
For BTC, my attention is on whether the price can recover $80,000.
For ETH, I am watching whether buyers can regain $2,500.
If the market confirms strength, I will look for continuation.
If the market becomes weak, I will respect support levels instead of forcing a trade.
My View on Long and Short Opportunities
I do not believe traders should enter every position in the same direction.
A long opportunity becomes more interesting to me when a major resistance is successfully reclaimed with strong momentum.
A short-term bearish opportunity becomes more relevant if important support breaks and sellers remain in control.
The key is confirmation.
BTC bullish focus: $80,000 → $83,000 → $85,000
BTC risk zones: $77,000 → $75,000 → $73,000
ETH bullish focus: $2,500 → $2,550 → $2,700
ETH risk zones: $2,400 → $2,300
These are market levels I am watching rather than guaranteed outcomes.
My Risk Management
This is the most important part of my trading strategy.
A reward campaign can be exciting, but I never want excitement to replace discipline.
My rules are:
Do not use excessive leverage.
Do not put all capital into one position.
Do not chase a move after a major percentage increase.
Protect profits when the market reaches important resistance.
Accept small losses when the original market idea becomes invalid.
For me, protecting capital is more important than forcing a trade.
My Thoughts for Trading Friends
BTC around $78,000 and ETH around $2,456 are creating an interesting market environment, but volatility remains high.
My advice is:
Do not trade only to increase volume.
Trade when you understand the setup.
Watch BTC because it often determines overall market direction.
Watch ETH because strong momentum can create additional opportunities.
And always respect risk.
My Focus for the Remaining Event Period
My eyes are on:
BTC: $78,000 → $80,000 → $83,000 → $85,000
ETH: $2,456 → $2,500 → $2,550 → $2,700
At the same time, I am carefully watching:
BTC: $77,000 → $75,000
ETH: $2,400 → $2,300
The market can move quickly, which makes this event an exciting opportunity to test trading discipline and market analysis.
The reward structure is attractive, but my biggest priority remains making smart decisions.
My strategy is simple:
Study the market.
Wait for confirmation.
Enter with discipline.
Manage risk.
Protect capital.
And never let FOMO control the trade.
The Event Contract Trading Carnival is heating up, and with BTC near $78,000 and ETH around $2,456, the coming days could bring significant opportunities for traders who remain patient and discipline .#Bitcoin #Ethereum #RiskManagement

$SENSETIME ‌#sensetime $SENSETIME ‌$00020 SENSETIME Surges 3.85% to 1.48 HKD: A Technical Rebound Demands Immediate Strategic Reassessment.
The $00020 SENSETIME stock CFD has staged a sharp intraday reversal, climbing 3.85% to trade at 1.48 HKD. This move is more than just a routine bounce; it signals a decisive battle for short-term trend control that requires immediate attention from active traders. The 4-hour chart reveals a violent V-shaped recovery from the 1.42 HKD low, with price now squeezing back above its clustered moving averages. For participants in the Gate Square Stock Opinion Challenge, this volatility is not noise, it is critical data that must inform your next analytical post before the market finds its next equilibrium.
From a technical perspective, the consolidation is at a tipping point. The price is trading at 1.48 HKD, just above the 5-period moving average ($1.46), the 10-period moving average ($1.47), and the 30-period moving average ($1.46). This tight MA cluster between 1.46-1.47 has flipped from resistance to immediate support, but the compression also warns of indecision. The recent peak at 1.62 HKD has established a formidable ceiling, while the base low at 1.27 HKD remains the structural floor. A sustained hold above 1.47 HKD would confirm bullish re-accumulation and open the door toward a retest of 1.54 HKD and then 1.62 HKD. Conversely, a failure back below 1.46 HKD would signal a bull trap and potential mean reversion toward 1.42 HKD.
Fundamentally, this 3.85% jump on an 8.45% intraday range suggests a significant re-risking event tied to headlines. With SenseTime forecasting H1 2026 profit of RMB 500M+, markets are repricing AI profitability expectations. The fact that the rebound came from a long lower wick near 1.42 HKD on heavy weekend trading volume indicates dip-buyers are actively defending the level, but the red candle into the close at 1.48 HKD shows sellers are still capping upside. This creates a high-stakes environment for traders: is this the start of a sustainable breakout driven by fundamental turnaround, or a short-covering rally into MA resistance? Your analysis for the Gate Square challenge must address this dichotomy using observable price action, not speculative narratives.
Risk management is non-negotiable in this environment. The MACD reading at 0.00 with DIF at 0.00 and DEA at 0.00 reflects complete momentum neutrality after the prior downtrend, price must now create separation. Bulls must absorb supply between 1.48 HKD and 1.54 HKD to regain control, while bears will look to reload on any push toward 1.57-1.62 HKD. For challenge participants, your opinion should focus on these specific mechanics. Are you anticipating continuation above the MA cluster toward 1.54 HKD? Or do you believe the tight MA convergence and flat MACD signal further chopping toward 1.35 HKD? Your thesis must be grounded in these verifiable levels.
The Gate Square Stock Opinion Challenge is entering its final countdown, and moments of high volatility like this are where true analytical skill is demonstrated. Do not simply predict direction. Analyze the wick structure, assess the moving average compression, and evaluate the risk-reward ratio at 1.48 HKD. First-time participants are guaranteed a reward for their initial post, and daily participation unlocks USDT prizes, merchandise, and VIP5 status. The 10,000 USDT prize pool is reserved for those who provide consistent, high-quality analysis during chaotic market conditions.
Ultimately, the bounce to 1.48 HKD is a test of discipline. It forces traders to confront the difference between hope and evidence. Use this compression to refine your thesis. Whether you see value accumulation or distribution, back your claim with the data visible on the chart. The market will eventually reveal its next move, but your ability to interpret this MA-cluster battle is what defines your edge. Participate now, document your reasoning with precision, and let your analytical rigor set you apart in the challenge.

I anticipate a 2-1 victory for Real Madrid
My prediction 2-1 victory for Real Madrid
The final day of the Five Major Leagues prediction event presents a high-stakes analytical challenge where historical dominance meets volatile market dynamics across three distinct European fixtures.
As the promotional campaign reaches its conclusion, participants face a critical decision matrix involving Real Madrid versus Málaga, Manchester United against Ipswich Town, and Monaco hosting Marseille. These matchups represent more than simple sporting contests; they are case studies in risk assessment, form analysis, and the unpredictability of competitive sports. For serious analysts, the objective is not merely to guess a scoreline but to construct a defensible thesis based on verifiable data, tactical matchups, and current team conditions. The convergence of these three games at the end of an event cycle creates a unique opportunity to demonstrate predictive discipline under pressure, separating informed forecasting from speculative gambling.
From a tactical perspective, each fixture demands a distinct analytical framework. Real Madrid’s encounter with Málaga typically favors the home side due to superior squad depth and historical head-to-head records. However, professional analysis must account for potential rotation policies, injury updates, and Málaga’s specific counter-attacking strategies that have historically troubled elite teams at the Bernabéu. Similarly, Manchester United’s clash with newly promoted Ipswich Town introduces variables related to adaptation and motivation. Newly promoted sides often exhibit heightened intensity in early-season fixtures against traditional giants, leveraging unfamiliarity as a tactical advantage. Analyzing Ipswich’s pre-season preparation, transfer activity, and defensive organization provides more insight than relying solely on United’s reputation. Meanwhile, the Monaco-Marseille derby represents a high-variance environment where emotional factors and local rivalry intensity often override statistical models. Derbies frequently produce outlier results, making this fixture the most challenging to predict with confidence but potentially the most rewarding for those who correctly identify non-obvious catalysts.
Economically and strategically, participating in the final stage of such prediction events requires understanding incentive structures. Platforms design these campaigns to drive engagement through gamification, offering rewards that incentivize volume of participation rather than accuracy alone. While this lowers barriers to entry, it also increases noise in the collective prediction pool. Serious participants must differentiate their analysis by focusing on edge—identifying information or perspectives that the majority overlooks. This might involve analyzing expected goals (xG) trends, pressing efficiency metrics, or goalkeeper save percentages rather than relying on win-loss records. The value lies not in matching consensus but in articulating a well-reasoned contrarian view supported by data.
Technologically, modern sports analytics has transformed how predictions are formulated. Access to real-time tracking data, biometric monitoring, and advanced statistical modeling allows for granular assessment of team performance beyond traditional box scores. Participants leveraging these tools gain significant advantages over those relying on narrative-driven analysis. However, technology also introduces new risks: overfitting models to historical data, misinterpreting small sample sizes, or failing to account for qualitative factors like locker room dynamics or managerial changes. The most effective predictions integrate quantitative rigor with contextual awareness, recognizing that numbers describe what happened but not always why it will happen again.
Risk management remains paramount when committing to final predictions. Unlike financial markets where positions can be adjusted dynamically, sports predictions are binary outcomes with no mid-game hedging opportunities. Therefore, position sizing—in this context, the allocation of confidence and reward capital—must reflect uncertainty levels. Diversifying predictions across multiple matches reduces single-point failure risk, while concentrating bets on highest-conviction plays maximizes potential returns for those with strong analytical edges. Understanding one’s own predictive track record and calibrating confidence accordingly prevents overconfidence bias, a common pitfall during high-stakes finale events.
For my personal prediction, I am placing highest confidence in **Real Madrid defeating Málaga**, though not necessarily by a large margin. My analysis suggests Madrid’s home advantage and superior technical quality will prevail, but Málaga’s organized defensive structure and counter-threat could keep the scoreline respectable. I anticipate a 2-1 victory for Real Madrid, reflecting both their offensive capability and the persistent challenges posed by disciplined opposition. This prediction balances historical precedent with current tactical realities, avoiding the trap of assuming automatic dominance while still acknowledging the fundamental disparity in resources and execution.
In conclusion, the final day of the Five Major Leagues prediction event serves as a microcosm of analytical decision-making under uncertainty. Success requires synthesizing tactical knowledge, technological insights, economic incentives, and disciplined risk management into coherent forecasts. Whether predicting football outcomes or navigating financial markets, the principles remain consistent: ground conclusions in evidence, acknowledge limitations, manage exposure prudently, and maintain intellectual humility regardless of outcome. Publish your analysis with conviction but prepare for variability—the true measure of expertise lies not in being right every time, but in building processes that generate positive expected value over the long term.
#GateStockInsightsChallenge
#五大联赛赛前预测官

#五大联赛赛前预测官 Monaco vs Marseille
Marseille can be trusted today!
Marseille’s schedule at the start of the new season has not been easy. Although they did not put in a dominant performance last round, the team’s overall competitive form has gradually returned, and a brief dip cannot negate their underlying strength. The squad is nearly at full strength, the attacking players are becoming increasingly well-coordinated, and several key players can all feature in this match. The team needs to win this crucial showdown to consolidate its position near the top of the league.
As for Monaco, their start to the new season has been inconsistent. Although they appear to have the home advantage, their defense is actually riddled with problems. They simply rely on getting numbers back and struggle to establish a coherent defensive system. It was only because their opponents lacked the ability to capitalize on chances in the opening rounds that Monaco managed to save face at home. For Monaco, this match against Marseille is not a do-or-die battle; they can still make up for any points dropped here by taking points from lower- and mid-table teams later on. But it is different for Marseille. This is a clash between two strong sides, and if they cannot get the desired result away against Monaco, the team’s morale and rhythm in the battle for points will suffer a major blow.
Therefore, I believe Marseille can be trusted today!

🚀 🚀 🚀𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐭 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭
Large positions have officially returned to Hyperliquid in force. On-chain perpetual metrics reveal that 6 positions now exceed $100 million, while 176 positions have surpassed $10 million, signaling a major influx of whale liquidity and institutional leverage back into the DEX ecosystem.
📊 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐌𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐬
• Positions > $100M: 6 Accounts
• Positions > $50M: 18 Accounts
• Positions > $25M: 55 Accounts
• Positions > $10M: 176 Accounts
• Overall Bias: High Liquidity Expansion & Elevated Volatility 🐂
💡 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐓𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐌𝐞𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐌𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐭
1. Institutional On-Chain Shift: Massive positions migrating onto Hyperliquid reflect growing confidence in high-throughput, non-custodial perpetual DEX infrastructure.
2. Squeezing Risk & Volatility: Heavy concentration of mega-cap positions significantly increases the likelihood of volatility cascades, short squeezes, or rapid liquidation cascades.
3. Ecosystem Value Capture: Massive open interest directly boosts trading fee capture, further solidifying fundamental backing for $HYPE .
🎯 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐋𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐬 𝐓𝐨 𝐖𝐚𝐭𝐜𝐡 ($𝐇𝐘𝐏𝐄)
• Resistance 2: $90.00 (Psychological breakout expansion target)
• Resistance 1: $86.70 (Local high / major ATH resistance)
• Support 1: $78.50 (4H dynamic EMA support floor)
• Support 2: $72.00 (Macro structural demand base)
💡 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐒𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐨𝐬
1. Breakout Continuation: Sustained capital inflows and open interest expansion above $86.70 paves the way toward $90.00+.
2. Dip Buying: Look for support defense around $78.00–$80.00 for favorable re-entry risk-to-reward.
⚠️ Elevated open interest and mega-whale positioning can spark sudden price swings—always maintain tight risk parameters and stop-losses!
How do you view this return of mega-cap positions to Hyperliquid? Bullish momentum or potential cascade risk? Share your thoughts below! 👇
‍#Hyperliquid #HYPE #DEX #Crypto

#ENASurgesOver15%InADay
Is Ethena building one of the strongest comeback stories in DeFi?
ENA has suddenly become one of the most interesting tokens to watch after surging more than 15% in 24 hours, with the move from around $0.08 in mid-August toward $0.19 showing a dramatic shift in market sentiment.
But the interesting part isn't only the price action.
The bigger story is the change in Ethena's token economics.
On August 27, the Ethena Foundation announced several major structural changes that could reduce selling pressure and potentially create stronger value alignment between ENA and the broader ecosystem.
🔥 Four Changes Matter Most
1️⃣ Locked ENA buybacks
The Foundation purchased locked ENA from certain early investors who had been selling during the previous nine months. Investors who had not sold were also given an opportunity to exit at their original purchase price, but reportedly none accepted.
That matters because investor selling pressure has been one of the major concerns surrounding ENA.
2️⃣ VC unlock structure is changing
Future monthly VC investor unlocks are being eliminated, with remaining original investor tokens expected to be released at once beginning October 5.
Team tokens will continue under their existing vesting schedules.
This could significantly change how traders think about future supply pressure.
3️⃣ Potential ENA buyback engine
The biggest potential catalyst may be the governance proposal to direct 95% of net revenue from Ethena-branded businesses toward ENA buybacks once USDe circulation reaches $7.5 billion.
If approved and eventually activated, this could create an interesting economic flywheel:
USDe growth → higher revenue → ENA buybacks → reduced market supply → stronger token economics.
The remaining 5% would be used to support growth.
4️⃣ Greater ecosystem alignment
An agreement in principle would place substantially more of Ethena's economic upside and intellectual property with the Foundation and broader ecosystem rather than primarily with Ethena Labs equity holders.
For ENA holders, that could create a clearer connection between protocol growth and token-holder interests.
📊 Technical Picture
ENA is currently trading around $0.188–$0.19, making this an important resistance area.
🔹 Resistance: $0.19
🔹 First support: $0.162
🔹 Lower support: $0.14
🔹 Major support: $0.135
If ENA can hold $0.162 and successfully break above $0.19, the current recovery could gain another wave of momentum.
But losing $0.162 would weaken the short-term structure and could send price toward the $0.14–$0.135 region.
⚠️ The Big Risk
The buyback mechanism is not active yet. USDe reportedly needs to reach around $7.5B in circulation, compared with roughly $4B currently.
ENA is also still dramatically below its historical high of $1.52, so the long-term recovery remains a challenging road.
For me, the real question isn't whether ENA can have another green day.
It's whether USDe adoption can continue growing fast enough to turn Ethena's new economic structure into actual demand for ENA.
If that happens, this rally could represent more than a short-term pump.
It could be the beginning of a completely new chapter for Ethena. 🚀
Would you rather buy ENA near $0.16 support or wait for a confirmed breakout above $0.19? 👀
#Ethena #ENA #GateSquare #Gate股票观点挑战

#StrategySharesBreak135ForFirstTimeIn12Weeks
STRATEGY JUST BROKE A LEVEL THAT HAD KEPT BUYERS UNDER PRESSURE FOR WEEKS.
MSTR has officially returned to the spotlight.
After spending roughly 12 weeks below the $135 area, Strategy Inc. finally pushed through this major resistance zone. The move was powerful enough to take MSTR to an intraday high near $139.78, marking its highest level in roughly three months and delivering a major momentum signal to the market.
But here is where the story gets even more interesting.
The breakout above $135 was not simply another daily move. It came after a strong recovery in Bitcoin and renewed demand for crypto-related equities. Because Strategy has built a massive Bitcoin treasury, MSTR often reacts aggressively when BTC momentum accelerates.
Bitcoin moves higher.
Investor confidence improves.
Crypto-related stocks attract attention.
And MSTR can move much faster.
That is exactly what traders witnessed during this latest rally.
MSTR pushed through $135 and briefly reached $139.78 before sellers stepped back in. The stock then experienced a sharp reversal, finishing the latest reported session at approximately $127.31, down more than 7% on the day.
So the market now has one BIG question:
WAS $135 A REAL BREAKOUT — OR A FAILED BREAKOUT?
This is the level traders should watch closely.
If MSTR can reclaim $135 and hold above it with strong volume, the previous resistance could potentially become new support. A sustained move above $135 would strengthen the bullish structure and put the psychological $140 level directly back into focus.
But if sellers continue rejecting the $135–$140 zone, the recent move could turn into a classic breakout failure.
That makes the next few sessions extremely important.
KEY MSTR LEVELS:
$127.31 — latest reported closing price
$135 — major breakout level
$139.78 — recent intraday high
$140 — major psychological resistance
Below $127 — momentum could weaken further
The bigger picture remains tied to Bitcoin.
Strategy is one of the market's most closely watched Bitcoin-linked equities, and its enormous BTC treasury means changes in Bitcoin sentiment can have a major impact on MSTR's valuation and investor appetite. When BTC rallies strongly, traders often look toward MSTR for amplified exposure. When Bitcoin pulls back, however, MSTR can experience equally aggressive downside pressure.
That is why this stock is NOT a normal momentum trade.
It is a Bitcoin-linked volatility machine.
The recent breakout proves that buyers are still willing to step in aggressively. But the failure to hold above $135 also proves that sellers are not ready to disappear.
NOW THE BATTLE IS CLEAR:
BULLS WANT $135 BACK AS SUPPORT.
BEARS WANT $135 TO REMAIN RESISTANCE.
Whichever side wins this battle could determine the next major move.
MSTR has already climbed back to its highest level in approximately 12 weeks.
Now it needs confirmation.
A strong reclaim above $135 could reopen the path toward $140 and potentially higher levels.
A continued rejection could send the stock back toward lower support zones.
For traders watching Bitcoin-linked equities, this is a chart that deserves serious attention.
STRATEGY BROKE THE WALL.
NOW THE MARKET WANTS TO KNOW IF IT CAN STAY ABOVE IT.
$MSTR ‌ $BTC ‌
#Strategy #MST #BTC. .
@Gate_Square