runesleo

Although I’ve tried various AI products, such as ChatGPT, Claude, Grokbot, and Cursor, I still prefer having just one conversational interface.
I want to get all my work done through a single conversational interface, without having to switch back and forth. I wonder if anyone else feels the same way? For example, setting up conversations with various bots in Bot may feel great at first, but over time, it can really become exhausting
So what I’ve always been pursuing is opening a new ChatGPT conversation or a new Claude conversation, and then having it gradually help me solve all my subsequent

The most annoying thing about using Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Grok at the same time is that something discussed with one can’t be found when switching to another.
I’ve open-sourced the export script I use: it exports local chat histories from all four into Markdown, one file per conversation, so any AI can find them with grep or full-text search.
· Reads local files only; no network access and no changes to any app
· Incremental exports, processing only conversations that have changed
· Replaces credentials such as API keys and tokens before writing to disk, so the files can only be read

Yes, GPT-5.6 Sol can now be selected directly in Cursor. However, OpenAI plans to discontinue direct access in Cursor around November 12, after which you’ll need to enter your own API key to continue using it.

When you ask ChatGPT or Claude to help execute on-chain operations involving funds, they often refuse, and nothing you say will change their mind.
At that point, you can try Cursor App: have ChatGPT or Claude write the prompt for you directly, then copy it over and execute it. Auto works—tested personally

Although everyone is criticizing ChatGPT CodeX’s model capabilities these days, to be fair, its new intelligent output style looks much more comfortable than before, whether on the mobile app or desktop app, unlike in the past when it displayed a huge wall of text that was very tiring to read

Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark moved his estimate for when full RSI could be achieved forward from 2028 to 2027.
One reason is TasteVal: after being given a research question, AI is rapidly improving its efficiency in designing and iterating experiments.
But this is still not full self-improvement. Independently selecting research topics, validating the value of research, and continuously improving the next generation of models remain distinct levels of capability.
For independent builders, I believe the next priority is not deploying a few more Bots, but enabling AI to truly complete the loo

Polymarket 5m late-stage trading—these are the two most common complaints in the group these days:
I place an order at 99c, but it never gets filled.
When a reversal really happens, I can't get out at all.
First, the issue of not getting filled.
A group member broke down a late-stage account and found that almost all of its trades came from limit orders:
It places orders at 0.99 as soon as the market closes,
picking up orders from those unwilling to wait for settlement and selling early,
and rarely waits for the price to reach 0.99 before chasing.
Someone tried it with a small amount:
12 marke

I heard someone got an old banned Claude account reinstated, so I’m going to try appealing an account of mine that was banned a few months ago too.
The appeal email has been sent, but it hasn’t been unbanned yet. I’ll update when there’s a result.

Run Claude, Codex, Cursor, and Grok on the same computer to write code at the same time, and the first thing to break isn't the code—it's git.
Every session says “committed,” but in reality: changes are left on feature branches and never make it back to main, uncommitted files keep piling up, and occasionally a leftover lock causes commits across the entire repository to fail silently. Writing rules into the prompt is useless; switch to another AI and it no longer follows them.
My approach: turn version control from “AI self-discipline” into an AI-independent overnight task that checks every r

Several Claude Code sessions being remotely controlled on my phone all went offline last night. After looking into it, the problem wasn't the network—the Mac itself couldn't handle it: too many Agents, browsers, and background tasks were running at once, maxing out the CPU and memory. Even the proxy couldn't get any CPU time, so the remote connection kept disconnecting and reconnecting.
I’ve now added a load sentinel: every 2 minutes, it checks the load, memory, and process count. If they stay above the threshold, it sends an alert to TG telling me which type of process is consuming the resour

Because Claude Max has been burning through a lot of usage these past two days and my weekly quota is almost used up, I went back to the ChatGPT window to use GPT-6 again, only for it to crash as soon as I did.
Why does it always do this? Every time, even though the task clearly isn’t finished, it just stops on its own and gives you a report saying that it failed, didn’t do a good job, did it incorrectly, shouldn’t have done this or that, and then stops completely.
What exactly is it waiting for? For me to keep sending new instructions over and over? And then every time it stops at the point w

When you let AI do something externally on your behalf—send messages, schedule events, place orders—the most dangerous thing isn’t an error; it’s saying, “I’m not sure whether it succeeded.”
I ran into this a couple of days ago: the submission actually succeeded, but when the tool went back to confirm, the page hadn’t loaded yet, so it recorded the status as “unknown.”
At that point, the easiest action for AI is to submit again. The result: two duplicate posts and two duplicate orders.
The rule I gave it: unknown status = no resending, verification only. Open the actual list and count: 1 item