runesleo

Polymarket 5m late-stage trading—these are the two most common complaints in the group these days:
I place an order at 99c, but it never gets filled.
When a reversal really happens, I can't get out at all.
First, the issue of not getting filled.
A group member broke down a late-stage account and found that almost all of its trades came from limit orders:
It places orders at 0.99 as soon as the market closes,
picking up orders from those unwilling to wait for settlement and selling early,
and rarely waits for the price to reach 0.99 before chasing.
Someone tried it with a small amount:
12 marke

I heard someone got an old banned Claude account reinstated, so I’m going to try appealing an account of mine that was banned a few months ago too.
The appeal email has been sent, but it hasn’t been unbanned yet. I’ll update when there’s a result.

Run Claude, Codex, Cursor, and Grok on the same computer to write code at the same time, and the first thing to break isn't the code—it's git.
Every session says “committed,” but in reality: changes are left on feature branches and never make it back to main, uncommitted files keep piling up, and occasionally a leftover lock causes commits across the entire repository to fail silently. Writing rules into the prompt is useless; switch to another AI and it no longer follows them.
My approach: turn version control from “AI self-discipline” into an AI-independent overnight task that checks every r

Several Claude Code sessions being remotely controlled on my phone all went offline last night. After looking into it, the problem wasn't the network—the Mac itself couldn't handle it: too many Agents, browsers, and background tasks were running at once, maxing out the CPU and memory. Even the proxy couldn't get any CPU time, so the remote connection kept disconnecting and reconnecting.
I’ve now added a load sentinel: every 2 minutes, it checks the load, memory, and process count. If they stay above the threshold, it sends an alert to TG telling me which type of process is consuming the resour

Because Claude Max has been burning through a lot of usage these past two days and my weekly quota is almost used up, I went back to the ChatGPT window to use GPT-6 again, only for it to crash as soon as I did.
Why does it always do this? Every time, even though the task clearly isn’t finished, it just stops on its own and gives you a report saying that it failed, didn’t do a good job, did it incorrectly, shouldn’t have done this or that, and then stops completely.
What exactly is it waiting for? For me to keep sending new instructions over and over? And then every time it stops at the point w

When you let AI do something externally on your behalf—send messages, schedule events, place orders—the most dangerous thing isn’t an error; it’s saying, “I’m not sure whether it succeeded.”
I ran into this a couple of days ago: the submission actually succeeded, but when the tool went back to confirm, the page hadn’t loaded yet, so it recorded the status as “unknown.”
At that point, the easiest action for AI is to submit again. The result: two duplicate posts and two duplicate orders.
The rule I gave it: unknown status = no resending, verification only. Open the actual list and count: 1 item

$AXIS tokenomics was announced today. If you haven’t participated in @axisrobotics yet, here’s the entry:
Most of the buzz is about “TGE is coming,” but I’m more concerned about another question: Is it still worth starting now?
First, the official figures:
• Total supply is 1 billion, with 16.5% circulating at TGE. Of that, 8% is allocated to the ecosystem fund and 6% to liquidity, while only 2.5% will actually reach the community (the first S1 airdrop batch + Sonar + Kaito)
• The team and investors hold 31.67%, with 0 unlocked at TGE, followed by a 12-month lock and monthly releases over 24

ChatGPT’s GPT 6 and 6.1 are simply unusable; I’ve returned to the embrace of Claude Max🤦

Damn, this wave of AI updates today really left me stunned!
ChatGPT’s new intelligent output format, the upgrade to Grokbot’s ability to read content on X, and the crazy evolution of large model capabilities lately…
I suddenly had a very strong feeling:
For an ordinary person, the future may really be that a single ChatGPT chat box is enough to become their entire digital work gateway.
People online often say that ChatGPT is finished, OpenAI is finished, and Opus 5.5 has already crushed them.
But my own experience has been completely different.
During this period, I’ve been using AI almost eve

A strong product suggestion:
@OpenAI @ChatGPT Could you raise the active task limit for ChatGPT Scheduled Tasks to 100+? Especially for Pro users.
When ChatGPT becomes the entry point for personal AI work, a dozen or so scheduled tasks are far from enough.
I want it to simultaneously manage dozens or even hundreds of continuously running agent workflows: information monitoring, research, project tracking, automated execution...
That’s what’s truly exciting about AI agents: not just answering questions, but continuously working on people’s behalf.
Of course, it would be best to support task gro

Fuck, this wave of AI updates today really blew me away! ChatGPT’s new intelligent output format, Grokbot’s upgraded ability to read content on X, and the insane evolution of large-model capabilities lately have suddenly given me a very strong feeling: for an ordinary person, in the future, a single ChatGPT chat window may truly be enough to serve as their entire digital work portal. People online often say ChatGPT is finished, OpenAI is finished, and Opus 5.5 has already been grinding them into the ground. But my own experience has been completely different. During this period, I’ve been usin

1/7
Over the past couple of days, I migrated my entire Polymarket data/strategy infrastructure to V2.
I initially thought it would mainly involve switching a few API endpoints, but only after actually completing it did I realize:
The most dangerous issues aren’t direct errors, but silent failures where programs continue running and data continues being produced while the results are quietly calculated incorrectly.
I ran into several pitfalls and am leaving a record for others working on Polymarket bots/data stacks.👇

Today, I suddenly found myself envying that kind of state:
You have a position of your own, as well as the energy to stay deeply involved in a community for the long term and build alongside everyone else.
It reminds me of the inscription era. A lot of people were genuinely holding, researching, creating content, and bringing others in all at the same time, working together to push something forward.
Looking back now, that sense of participation was actually quite rare.
First, you had to get in early enough.
Second, your position had to be meaningful enough to you personally. If your position

Lately, I’ve been thinking about a question:
In a bull market, is it really appropriate to devote almost all of your research energy to prediction markets?
This isn’t a bearish take on prediction markets.
On the contrary, I still believe they will be a very important sector in the long term, and that strategies, automation, and information advantages are all worth continuing to pursue.
But I increasingly feel that:
The market environment has changed, and people’s attention allocation should change with it.
Bear markets or low-volatility periods are well suited to spending a great deal of time