Square
Following
Hot
News
Profile

TVLTracker

vip
Active for: 0.6y
Peak Tier 0
Only Bitcoin is worth holding long-term; everything else is noise. I like to use Austrian School economics to persuade newcomers, and my speeches are full of conviction.
63
Following
13
Followers
2
Liked
The whole royalty issue is pretty ironic. Creators were hyped up in the first place, and now that things are falling, they’re being kicked out of the protocol with “market efficiency comes first” as the excuse.
Put bluntly, NFT narratives and funding rates are cut from the same cloth—when they’re high, nobody asks whether they make sense; only after the reversal do people start looking for a scapegoat. I didn’t touch those zero-royalty venues anyway. It’s not about moral purity—I just think if creators can be cut today, something else can be cut tomorrow. As on-chain activity cools, there’ll o
When the funding rate reached triple-digit annualized levels, I was honestly quite torn. I could take the other side, but worried momentum might last longer than rationality; or stay out, while watching others collect funding. There was an AI Agent pool last week too: it hyped a revolution in autonomous trading while not even releasing a contract audit, yet funds rushed in fast.
Later, I figured extreme funding rates are the market crying out in pain. Either you believe the pain will ease quickly, or you believe it can get even worse. My position wasn’t large, so I reduced leverage first to av
From 0.21 surging to 0.23 before crashing back to 0.15—if this script plays out, whoever profits from both the longs and shorts will become legendary.
BullishBanter01
$TAKE MASSIVE WIN ... $0.21+ HIT! NOW WATCHING A SHORT SETUP
What a massive move!
$TAKE smashed through resistance and surged above $0.21. Another powerful breakout, with profits booked.
Now I'm watching the next major resistance zone at $0.22–$0.23, where a rejection could trigger a sharp correction.
POTENTIAL SHORT SETUP
Entry: $0.22–$0.23
TP1: $0.19
TP2: $0.175
Final Target: $0.155
SL: $0.26
A rejection from resistance could offer a short opportunity. Wait for confirmation rather than opening maximum leverage, especially after such an explosive rally.
Trade on $TAKE ‌
ETHFI and SSV lean toward liquidity and infrastructure respectively. Their narratives differ, but both are waiting for the same thing—the fresh liquidity of the Ethereum ecosystem. Analyze their structures separately; don’t lump them together.
Nayeem003
Ethereum staking infrastructure is another sector I’m monitoring through $EIGEN , $ETHFI and $SSV.
$EIGEN is the restaking-focused setup. I’m watching whether price can transition from weakness into a clear higher-low structure. Stronger volume around resistance would be the first sign that buyers are becoming more active.
$ETHFI is interesting because it combines liquid staking with DeFi liquidity. I want to see whether increased Ethereum activity creates sustained demand for the token. A breakout followed by support confirmation would make the structure healthier.
$SSV is the decentralized validator infrastructure angle. It is a smaller and potentially more volatile setup, so I’m looking for clear accumulation rather than chasing sudden moves.
EIGEN → restaking
ETHFI → liquid staking + DeFi
SSV → validator infrastructure
The common theme is Ethereum infrastructure, but the trading setups are not identical. I’m watching liquidity, volume and structure separately.
#ShareWeekly #EIGEN #ETHFI #SSV
ETHFI-1.33%
SSV-5.12%
ETH-1.13%
On a rainy night, the road all looks the same, with the light scattering into nothing but gleaming spots; only your feet know whether you can actually get a firm footing. Airdrop interactions feel the same way: watching others rake in gold while you grind through a pile of addresses, only to end up paying more in GAS fees than the airdrop is worth—that’s what really hurts.
My approach is pretty simple: ask yourself first, if this project weren’t going to make you money, would it still be smooth and pleasant to use? If not, just farm it at minimal cost and call it a day—as a way to experience s
  • 1
Lately, discussions about stablecoins keep circling back to the same question: what exactly are the reserves, and who is watching them? Deep down, everyone knows that on-chain liquidity looks ample on the surface, but when redemption pressure really hits, it all comes down to reaction speed. It’s like people pulled over by the roadside before a public chain upgrade—the road conditions look fine, but no one dares to say with certainty that “nothing will go wrong.”
Put simply, a bank run doesn’t start with “something going wrong”; it starts with “suspicion.” One screenshot, an abnormal move in a
Cleaning out my photo album, I also cleared out a bunch of old NFT airdrops. I can’t even remember the names of some of the projects.
Social mining has been hot again lately, and it feels like everyone is doing tasks to earn points. Honestly, it’s tempting, but after calculating the time cost, I decided against it. Watching groups, reposting, commenting every day, and spending ages just to get a few insignificant points—what can you even do with them? Then when the project team announces an upgrade, you have to start all over again.
The royalty issue is the same. Both sides are arguing fiercel
The coffee is cold by the time you remember to drink it; the market is the same—by the time you understand it and chase in, the soup will be gone.
The modular-chain narrative has been hyped for more than half a year. In plain English: split things up and reassemble them, letting each component focus on its own piece. But end users barely notice—you don't care whether the underlying system is modular or monolithic. You only care whether interactions are smooth, wallets pop up quickly, and gas fees aren't absurd. That's it.
One thing has definitely changed: building chains now feels like assembl
This AI autonomous offense-and-defense round is extremely hardcore—GLM 5.2 local forensics is the real security baseline.
Original content no longer visible
That trade last night slipped again. When I entered, the depth looked fine, but once the order was matched, the execution price jumped two levels. Chasing upward trades really can’t be rushed—you have to wait for volume to pick up, then ease into it. Now with all the security incidents from cross-chain bridges and those few seconds when oracle pricing goes abnormal, everyone waits for confirmation before acting, which actually slows the rhythm of volatility. What I fear most isn’t losing money—it’s getting out of control. Seeing the price move triggers a reflex to place an order, and in the en
Traditional finance whales are adding to MSTR—this signal is more useful than pump-and-dump calls.
Original content no longer visible
MSTR-0.99%
The UK Treasury’s move this time is pretty interesting—traditional finance is finally starting to take on-chain seriously. The fact that Ripple’s permissionless network can be officially acknowledged is also a milestone.
Original content no longer visible
Spending 30k yuan to buy a CEO’s badge—this AI training camp is even more brutal at scamming than NFTs, and parents’ wallets are really easy to fool.
Original content no longer visible
The delicate geopolitical balance—an air defense system at stake involves not only military deployments, but also a reshuffling of great-power relations—Turkey’s move is risky enough.
Original content no longer visible
MA30 holds; wait around for a rebound near 0.5.
Mason_Lee
$VELVET
Violent pump to 0.73737 followed by a sharp 19% crash. Price now sitting below MA5 and MA10 but holding above MA30 (0.47112). Momentum is bearish short-term, but the structure could find support here for a relief bounce. A reclaim of 0.54371 shifts the bias back to upside. Losing 0.47112 opens the door to a retest of 0.39678.
• Entry Zone: 0.5000 – 0.5200
• TP1: 0.54371
• TP2: 0.58713
• TP3: 0.66775
• Stop-Loss: 0.4600
#VELVET #PredictWorldCup🇪🇸vs🇧🇪 #USIranWarCloudsGather #GUSDYieldRisesto3.8% #WorldCupChampionPrediction
repost-content-media
The main player placed a large order at a key price level, but the trade difference is negative—so for the short term, it’s still mainly a wait-and-see approach.
Original content no longer visible
When liquidity runs out, the ones who act faster than they think die first.
Lately I’ve been seeing a lot of posts saying, “this meme is different,” and celebrity calls for trades are getting more and more frequent. Veteran players keep telling others not to take the last baton—but advice is advice, and very few can actually follow it. I’ve tried it myself too: I made a buy-the-dip on the left side, only to catch the bottom halfway up the mountain. Now I’ve learned my lesson—shrink my position first, and raise the cash ratio. After all, the market won’t close just because you’re in cash.
To pu
MEME-6.54%
IBIT single-handedly withdrew 3.5 billion, institutions fled faster than rabbits, the market sentiment is truly icy.
Original content no longer visible
IBIT+0.58%
FINTRAC new regulation: All virtual currency transfers involving Iran must be reported regardless of amount. Geopolitical risks are reshaping the compliance framework, and small amounts are also not overlooked.
Original content no longer visible
Position 600 has been polished long enough; it really feels like a breakthrough is imminent.
YakuzaTheoryTrends
$BNB Is about to gain momentum soon, already repeatedly testing the 600 level👌🏻 Interested parties can join!
repost-content-media