Share your thoughts
placeholder
Article
After $LAB surged to 0.05108, I instead took profits on 70% first. It’s not that I’m bearish, but this level is right around the key prior-high resistance, making it less cost-effective to keep chasing. The move up from 0.05001 formed a breakout-pullback-rebreakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. After the breakout, only if it pulls back on declining volume and holds the upper boundary will that establish a new entry setup; if it merely pushes above and then fal
post-image
LAB+1.29%
BNB+1.67%
SNDK+4.79%
$FB Looks like it will definitely drop to 0.3 today
post-image
FB-3.55%
Short $COTI
‼️$COTI is facing strong rejection from a major supply zone—expected to retrace to around $0.022. Entry: 0.0245 - Current price Take profit: 0.0223 Stop loss: 0.0274 Trade this $COTI 👇
post-image
COTI+47.70%
Those who embrace AI will flourish.
Those who don’t will fall behind.
If a company lays off their employees so AI can take over their jobs are missing the point.
They need to RETAIN those employees but have them use A.I. to 5x productivity so the ENTIRE company can grow.
It’s that simple.
NOTE: not ALL jobs can be saved but even the typewriter repairman could have been re-trained in I.T. and they would have been massively needed.
post-image
$ETH
2448Sharpening the knife😏, 2427 is a trap planted by the market makers—stepping on it means blood-soaked chips! The grass on the shorts’ graves at 2484 is already three meters high, as the whales shake out the market until your hands tremble. Break through 2484 and roll straight over it; only enter the ICU if 2427 cannot hold. Don’t wait for the explosive pump to chase—the meat will have been snatched up long ago🚀
post-image
ETH+1.18%
I had already finished complaining to my friends about this week’s market action, but now I have to take it all back—it’s a little awkward.
A few days ago, before bed, I saw $SCRT make another push. Every surge fell just short, with insufficient buying support, so I casually noted that there was no need to rush into SCRT shorts and to wait and see around 0.02694.
I woke up to 0.00772, a direct +1746.74% move. Those who were on board probably woke up laughing. Getting the timing right feels much better than keeping busy for nothing.
Take 80% off the table first, and move the remaining 20% to t
post-image
SCRT-7.42%
BTC+0.20%
ADA+3.37%
Who wants to trench with the boys ?
3 trench warriors .
Would pick from cm .
post-image
CM+0.72%
$BTC Signal】Short + 1H moving average resistance, short the rebound
$BTC 1H price 76239.6, RSI 44.85, 4H RSI 43.90, with the rebound yet to enter the overbought zone. EMA20/50 are overhead at 76441/76462, capping the price, while the 1H MACD histogram is expanding downward at -43.0275. The 4H Bollinger middle band is 76565.7050, with the price trading below it. Order book depth imbalance is 39.25%, and aggressive buying is inconsistent. Funding rate is 0.0097%, OI is stable, and short-side crowding is not high. The risk-reward ratio in this area is acceptable; position control is more importa
post-image
BTC+0.20%
BREAKING: Goldman Sachs sticks with its year-end 2027 gold forecast at $5,400/oz despite the Fed’s rate hikes. If momentum persists, it could keep gold buoyant as a hedge Narrative emerging around rate cycle resilience. $GOLD
post-image
GS+1.29%
Watching the market nonstop got annoying, but once I turned it off, I could see things more clearly. With my eyes no longer glued to it, I stopped feeling anxious.

While the market was bottoming out, $BEAT ’s rebound remained weak, and volume failed to follow. Nobody was taking it higher, so I flagged a BEAT short setup around 0.4692. I didn’t call it too aggressively—those who understood would naturally get it.

It weakened directly afterward, and 0.0858, +1608.09% was secured. That was a satisfying bite of profit; the wait beforehand was worth it.

Take 80% off first, and protect the rem
post-image
BEAT+4.99%
XRP-0.15%
LAB+1.29%
After $ONDO surged to 0.371, I instead took profit on 70% first. It’s not that I’m bearish; this level is right around the key previous-high resistance, so the cost-effectiveness of chasing further has decreased. The move up from 0.3497 formed a breakout-retest-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the previous high is the first key level. If, after the breakout, price can pull back on declining volume and hold the upper boundary, that would be the new entry logic; if it only pushes above and
post-image
ONDO+7.38%
BTC+0.20%
LAB+1.29%
September 18 Strategy Plan
Priority Ranking, for Regular Followers Only
Execution Priorities for Today
I will execute in the following order of priority:
First choice: Go long after stabilization at 2420–2430
Second choice: Go short if an upward push to 2475–2490 is rejected
Breakout long: The 1-hour chart holds above 2485 and confirms on a pullback
Breakdown short: The 1-hour chart breaks below 2408 and fails to rebound
Middle range of 2440–2465: Stand aside; do not chase trades
If none of the key areas above are reached today, I would rather not trade. So-called “precise levels” can only be
post-image
ETH+1.23%
[New Streamer] Market Prediction
live-cover
LIVE993
This was once the best coin on chain
What happened?
post-image
ON+7.50%
$ZEC It surged 13 points in one day. Would you dare chase it at 1472? I’ve already locked my stop-loss at 1300.
First, let’s look at the chart. ZEC went straight from the low of 1301 to 1516, with 4.35 billion in 24-hour trading volume. That’s not volume retail investors can generate. At 1472, there’s only $44 of room to the daily high. 1516 is the first resistance level today, followed by the 1550-1580 range, a previous high-volume trading zone. Technically, this is a bullish breakout candle backed by heavy volume, but the problem is that it has already moved too far away from the 5-day movin
ZEC+9.95%
After $PONS surged to 0.6571, I instead took 70% off first. It’s not that I’m bearish, but this level is right at the key prior-high resistance, making it less cost-effective to keep chasing. The move up from 0.6155 formed a breakout-pullback-breakout structure, with each pullback holding at a higher key level and volume expanding on the breakouts.

The key levels are clear now: the prior high is the first key level. If, after breaking out, price can pull back on declining volume and hold the upper boundary, that would be the new entry setup; if it only surges above it and then falls back, it
post-image
PONS+18.21%
SNDK+4.79%
ADA+3.37%
#Bitcoin & 10Y Real Yield Alert ⚡️
📊 The 10Y Real Yield has surged to 2.60, extending deep into restrictive territory above 2.00%. Macro liquidity is contracting following recent Fed tightening.
📍 Historically, elevated real yields drive capital into risk-free Treasuries over non-yielding assets. This places persistent opportunity cost pressure on at ~$76K.
💡 Sustained yield expansion above the red restrictive threshold caps macro upside. Risk of further downside continuation remains elevated.
post-image
BTC+0.20%
  • 1
To be honest, the fact that this trade has survived until now still surprises me; luck played a significant part.
A few days ago, $CYS price repeatedly tested the highs. I saw that volume failed to keep up and overhead pressure was obvious, so I suggested trying a short on CYS. I didn’t aggressively call for it—I simply put forward the 1.3889 level.
Now the market has provided the answer: 0.1383, with +1772.78% secured. The move was genuinely sluggish at first, but the result is genuinely satisfying.
Take 80% off first, and protect the remaining 20% at the entry price. If it continues falling
post-image
CYS+6.16%
LAB+1.29%
BTC+0.20%
Load More

Join 40 M users in our growing community

⚡️ Join 40 M users in the crypto craze discussion

💬 Engage with your favorite top creators

👍 See what interests you

Trending Topics

GateTopsStockPerpetualCoverage

36.31k Views1.88k Discussing

According to the latest DefiLlama report, Gate has listed 385 stock-related perpetual contracts, ranking first in coverage; average daily volume is about $1.15B and average open interest about $738M, both ranking third in the industry; liquidity depth for its five highest-volume contracts — SNDK, SKHYNIX, SPCX, SOXL, and MU — ranks first across the board. How do you view Gate leading in both coverage breadth and liquidity depth? [👉 Full Report](ttps://defillama.com/research/spotlight/deep-enough-trade-gate-case-tokens-stocks)

GateTrenchesExclusive0GasTrading

46.32k Views875 Discussing

FedHikes25bpsForFirstTimeIn3Years

32.64k Views8.54k Discussing

View More