Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
CFD
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Event Contracts
New
Predict price moves and seize opportunities
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
CFD
Stock CFD derivatives
Stocks
Invest directly in popular stocks and ETFs worldwide
Stock Futures
High leverage, 24/7 trading
Stock Options
New
Popular stock options, flexible leverage
Stocks Activities
Trade popular stocks and unlock generous airdrops
Tokenized Stocks
Backed by real stock assets
IPO Access
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
IPO Access
Anthropic
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Promotions
Others
Help Center
Find FAQs and help guides
Partners
Grow with the champions
Proof of Reserves
Gate promises 100% proof of reserves
Proof of Security (PoSEC)
Full cold storage for user funds
Gate Guard
Account Protection Plan
Gate Vault
Keep your assets secure
Licenses
Regulatory licenses, registrations, and approvals
#MicrosoftEndsOracleLeaseExits3Sites $MSFT $ORCL
Microsoft not renewing an Oracle AI lease and stepping back from some Nscale projects is being read as “AI spending is slowing”. I read it differently. Microsoft is still committed to more than $80 billion of rented compute, so this looks like a company becoming choosy, not one that is leaving. The useful question is who gets hurt first, and for that I’d split suppliers into three types.
What actually happened
Microsoft let a 2023 Oracle capacity lease lapse. It was originally signed to power AI features in Bing, and it ran on older Nvidia chips that reportedly no longer met Microsoft’s needs. Oracle said demand for its AI infrastructure remains strong, including for earlier generation GPUs. On the Nscale side, reports describe three separate moves: Microsoft pulled out of a roughly $3 billion arrangement for a planned UK site after grid officials reportedly said power would not arrive until the 2030s, it stepped away from a letter of intent for 1.35 gigawatts in West Virginia, and it declined to use an option to more than double its Texas deal. The existing Texas contract stays in place. Microsoft is also reported to be tightening oversight of projects run by several newer cloud firms because of delays and costs.
Type one, legacy capacity sellers
These are providers renting out older GPUs under leases that expire. The risk is a renewal cliff, where a customer simply doesn’t need last generation hardware anymore. Oracle is the clearest example. It said in September that customers renewed four year old GPU contracts at a 20% premium, which suggests demand exists for older chips from some buyers. But one large customer saying no matters more when one report puts Oracle’s annual free cash flow deficit above $23 billion. When cash flow is negative, every lost lease counts for more.
Type two, newer cloud builders with delivery risk
These firms are building capacity and signing contracts before sites are ready. The risk is timing. One of them has already pushed the date for bringing more than $4 billion of annualized revenue capacity from year end to January, with a possible slip to late February. Power availability, construction and financing all have to line up. Even so, Microsoft isn’t their only customer. Nscale’s own filing shows over $100 billion of contracted value, so one customer pulling back is serious but not fatal.
Type three, chip makers
They feel it last. Microsoft still needs a huge number of GPUs for its own sites, and it reportedly spent about $45 billion on capital spending and finance leases last quarter, according to one report. The slower risk is that Microsoft plans to run more of its own inference on its in house chips over time. That is a longer story than this week.
My ranking of who feels pressure first
First, newer cloud builders that are late on delivery. Second, legacy lessors with expiring leases and weak cash flow. Third, chip suppliers. This is my own ranking based on the reported facts, not a forecast.
What it means for prices
Microsoft on my chart is about 522, with support at 509.12, which is 2.5% lower, and then 459.24, which is 12.1% lower. Resistance is 526.82 at 0.9% higher and 549.94 at 5.3% higher. RSI is about 47, which is neutral. This is not a Microsoft problem. It’s lowering its supplier risk.
Oracle is about 124.66, with support at 113.79, which is 8.7% lower. Resistance is 125.38, 126.64 and 131.39, which is 5.4% higher, then 138.76 at 11.3% higher. RSI is about 47. On my chart price is roughly half of its summer peak, so a lot of bad news may already be in the price.
My take: this is discipline, not retreat, but discipline still has losers. I’d watch for the same pattern at other large buyers, because one buyer’s choice is a story and several is a trend. I’m watching whether any other big customer follows, and whether Oracle holds 113.79.
Not financial advice.
Which supplier type do you think is most exposed: legacy lessors, newer builders, or chip makers? And do you read this as caution or as the start of a slowdown?
#DailyStandouts #ShareWeekly #WCTCS9 @Gate_Square