Thursday's sell-off was the kind of session that makes investors ask whether the AI trade is breaking. The Nasdaq 100 fell about 6.4% and erased roughly $2.5 trillion in market value, its deepest one-day drop since "Liberation Day" in April 2025, according to Reuters. Chip stocks posted their second-biggest one-day fall on record. The question is whether this is a forced reset or the first leg of a longer unwind.

The numbers from the close

From the Gate feed's closing prints on 5 November: NVIDIA closed at $181.60, down 9.26%. AMD fell 17.26% to $404.40. Broadcom dropped 10.43% to $291.53. Meta slipped 3.96% and Microsoft 3.58%. Apple, Amazon and Alphabet held up better, falling between about 1.5% and 2.2%. The S&P 500 ETF (SPY) closed at $733.00, down 4.41%, and the Nasdaq 100 ETF (QQQ) at $647.05, down 6.49%.

What set it off

This was not a simple earnings miss. Investors reacted to the midterm result and to the possibility that a Democratic Congress and new state leaders could slow data-center construction. UBS estimated that nearly a third of new US data-center capacity due in 2028 could be delayed if construction pauses spread. That turns a valuation debate into a supply-chain question, and it touches chips, servers, power utilities and data-center operators at once.

Why I lean toward a deeper correction, not just deleveraging

Deleveraging explains the speed of the fall, but it does not explain why the damage spread through the whole supply chain. Data-center operators fell more than 14%, server makers and power names fell 7% to 9%, and GE Vernova dropped 7.4%. When the selling reaches the buyers of chips, not just the chips, investors are repricing the spending itself.

Rates offered no rescue. Treasury yields eased, and futures pushed the next expected Fed hike out to around March 2027. In a normal sell-off, lower yields help growth stocks. Here, they did not, because the market is worried about earnings from AI capex, not about financing costs.

Where I would place the next bet

Chip stocks are the highest-beta expression of the AI trade, and they will likely bounce hardest on any stabilization. But bounces inside a broken trend are dangerous. I would wait for NVIDIA to reclaim its prior support zone on a closing basis before treating a rally as more than a relief move.

Tech giants like Microsoft, Apple and Alphabet look more resilient, because their earnings do not depend entirely on new data-center construction. They fell less on Thursday, and they are the more defensive way to stay in the AI theme. The trade-off is that they also have less upside if the buildout accelerates.

Defensive sectors such as utilities and consumer staples have not been the leaders this week. Utilities that serve data centers have been hit, which shows that "defensive" depends on the specific exposure. Broader defensive sectors may be the safer place to wait while the AI trade resets.

What would change my view

I would call this a short-term deleveraging if NVIDIA and AMD stabilize above their Thursday lows, if data-center operators stop cutting guidance, and if tomorrow's jobs report keeps rate expectations steady. I would call it a deeper correction if those lows break, if capacity delays move from forecasts into actual order cuts, or if the Fed debate shifts back toward hikes with weak growth.

My bottom line

The sell-off looks more like a repricing of the AI build-out's timeline than a collapse in demand for AI itself. That makes it dangerous for anyone who bought the leaders at the top of the trend. I favor waiting for confirmation in chips, holding tech giants as the core AI exposure, and keeping some cash or defensive weight until the supply-chain picture clears.
Which do you favor next: chip stocks, tech giants or defensive sectors? Share your reasoning and the level that would change your mind.
#USStocks #NVDA #AMD

This page contains third-party content and does not constitute any advice, nor does it represent Gate's endorsement of such views. For details, please see disclaimer.