Everyone has to give a clear explanation of what happened to them – not to others, but to themselves. That's why people often have to "ask for an explanation". If you can't explain what you're going through, it's going to be very uncomfortable.

In the hospital, every terminally ill patient goes through a painful period of "self-explanation". "Why am I the one who has this disease?!" This is an extremely painful and difficult self-question. It may be a matter of probability, but "Why me?!" It reflects the unwillingness of every unfortunate person.
You may also observe this phenomenon when you are in middle school. Some of the ugly-looking girls in the class explained that "I never received a love letter" like this: "I'm not that kind of person! Unlike those vixens...... "Although the onlookers are clear, they themselves are convinced of their own explanations." However, is it true that such an explanation has no side effects at all, except that it makes you comfortable? In fact, the side effects are very long and long, for example, in addition to making themselves unreal, and maybe even in order to make such a distorted explanation more tenable, they will not hesitate to torture and frame those "vixens" in their mouths, although those "vixens" are not wrong at all except that they are more beautiful...... Of course, what is even worse, and which they themselves may never know, is that because they are actually distorted, the other half they will find in the future must also be distorted.

What is the biggest consensus of the "suckers"?
As far as I've observed, all suckers agree on a view that's actually wrong:
The so-called transaction is a "zero-sum game".
That is, they believe that the money they earn is the money that others lose; Or conversely, if they themselves lose longest or less, they must have earned the same amount of money by someone else.
It's paradoxical. When these "sucker" angrily denounce the "Be Played for Suckers guys", what are they essentially angry about? It seems that what they really hate is not "Be Played for Suckers" in their mouths; What they really hate, logically, can only be "Why didn't I be played for suckers?!" ”。 If there is an opportunity to "be played for suckers", they will not be soft, because this is what they consider a "zero-sum game", so everyone is a sucker, and everyone is a life: either when leeks are played people for suckers, or when other people's leeks are played.
What did they do wrong?
They completely ignore one of the biggest forces in the trading market: the economic cycle. Or in layman's terms, it is the alternation of bulls and bears.

In the Bull Market, the vast majority of long people have made money, and the amount of money lost by a few people is not equal to the total amount earned by so many long people; Which sucker was played people for suckers? In the Bear Market, the vast majority of long people have lost money, and the total amount lost by a large number of people is countless times the total amount earned by a few people, who is Be Played for Suckers?
So, it's not a "zero-sum game" at all!
In fact, at the tail of the Bull Market, whoever buys is the price of the hormone fattening; At the tail of the Bear Market, whoever buys is a skinny price waiting to be fed.
In the open trading market, no one can force you to trade with a gun, everyone is voluntary...... But why is it that when you voluntarily buy it, you are overjoyed, and then you start to cry out for heaven and land? We need an explanation. Yes, each of us needs to give ourselves a clear explanation of the embarrassment we are facing.
Do you want a correct explanation, or do you want one that makes you feel comfortable?
The right explanation will trigger your next right choice and action. An explanation that makes you comfortable but certainly incorrect, in addition to making you comfortable for a short period of time, is not correct, so it will inevitably only bring all sorts of "unexpected" side effects...... Which explanation do you want?

The correct explanation is simple:
We bought at the wrong time.
During the Bull Market, chickens and dogs ascend to heaven, and longest poor targets are likely to continue to big pump; In the Bear Market, thousands of horses are together, and sometimes good assets are fall more ruthlessly......
"The timing was wrong" is the most essential, reasonable, and instructive correct explanation, and it should even be the only reasonable explanation.
In addition, you have grown a little bit, and you will understand that in the future, you should never participate in any zero-sum game - this is more of a waste of time than gambling! (You know, in reality, fair gambling does not exist, in order to ensure fairness, or to use fairness as a means, all casinos design dealer win rates.) ）